[PATCH v7 2/2] ARM hibernation / suspend-to-disk
Sebastian Capella
sebastian.capella at linaro.org
Mon Mar 10 14:32:17 EDT 2014
On 6 March 2014 20:42, Stephen Boyd <sboyd at codeaurora.org> wrote:
> On 03/05, Sebastian Capella wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h
>> index 8756e4b..d32adbb 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h
>> @@ -291,6 +291,7 @@ static inline void *phys_to_virt(phys_addr_t x)
>> */
>> #define __pa(x) __virt_to_phys((unsigned long)(x))
>> #define __va(x) ((void *)__phys_to_virt((phys_addr_t)(x)))
>> +#define __pa_symbol(x) __pa((unsigned long)(x))
> Looking at this definition now it doesn't look right. Isn't
> &__nosave_begin a virtual address? Casting it to an unsigned long
> isn't going to give you a physical address. Why can't we use
> __pa()?
You're correct, sorry, I missed removing the cast, it's not needed.
I've removed the __pa_symbol define as I'm switching to the __pa
implementation you suggested below.
>> +extern const void __nosave_begin, __nosave_end;
>> +
>> +int pfn_is_nosave(unsigned long pfn)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long nosave_begin_pfn =
>> + __pa_symbol(&__nosave_begin) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>> + unsigned long nosave_end_pfn =
>> + PAGE_ALIGN(__pa_symbol(&__nosave_end)) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>> +
>> + return (pfn >= nosave_begin_pfn) && (pfn < nosave_end_pfn);
>> +}
>
> Perhaps this code could be:
>
> unsigned long nosave_begin_pfn = virt_to_pfn(&__nosave_begin);
> unsigned long nosave_end_pfn = virt_to_pfn(&__nosave_end);
>
> return (pfn >= nosave_begin_pfn) && (pfn <= nosave_end_pfn);
>
> or if virt_to_pfn() doesn't exist on ARM and we can't add it for
> some reason:
>
> unsigned long nosave_begin_pfn = __phys_to_pfn(__pa(&__nosave_begin));
> unsigned long nosave_end_pfn = __phys_to_pfn(__pa(&__nosave_end));
>
> return (pfn >= nosave_begin_pfn) && (pfn <= nosave_end_pfn);
I've moved to this second implementation. I don't think I understand
the ramifications enough to add the virt_to_pfn call for arm.
I've changed one thing. __nosave_end is pointing at the first byte
not included in the nosave region. I subtracted one from it so that
we make sure we're referring to the last pfn, and left the pfn
comparison as you'd suggested.
int pfn_is_nosave(unsigned long pfn)
{
unsigned long nosave_begin_pfn = __phys_to_pfn(__pa(&__nosave_begin));
unsigned long nosave_end_pfn = __phys_to_pfn(__pa(&__nosave_end - 1));
return (pfn >= nosave_begin_pfn) && (pfn <= nosave_end_pfn);
}
I'll test this and post it if everyone's ok with it.
Thanks for your review and comments Stephen!
Sebastian
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list