[PATCH v4 1/5] clk/samsung: add support for multiple clock providers

[Rahul Sharma]

On 10 March 2014 05:42, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Rahul,
>
>
> On 04.03.2014 12:12, Rahul Sharma wrote:
>>
>> Samsung CCF helper functions do not provide support to
>> register multiple Clock Providers for a given SoC. Due to
>> this limitation SoC platforms are not able to use these
>> helpers for registering multiple clock providers and are
>> forced to bypass this layer.
>>
>> This layer is modified accordingly to enable the support.
>>
>> Clock file for exynos4, exynos5250, exynos5420, exynos5440
>> and S3c64xx are also modified as per changed helper functions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rahul Sharma <rahul.sharma at samsung.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c    |   47 +++++++-------
>>   drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c |   25 +++++---
>>   drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c |   24 ++++---
>>   drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5440.c |   18 +++---
>>   drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c        |   14 +++--
>>   drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s3c64xx.c    |   44 +++++++------
>>   drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c            |  115
>> +++++++++++++++++++---------------
>>   drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h            |   72 ++++++++++++++-------
>>   8 files changed, 210 insertions(+), 149 deletions(-)
>
>
> This patch looks good. However in the meantime two series adding s3c2412 and
> s3c2416 clock drivers have been merged through Kgene's tree and this patch
> should be rebased on top of this. I have pulled those drivers to my tree as
> well, to samsung-next branch.
>

Sure. I will add similar changes for these 2 SoCs and repost v5.

Regards,
Rahul Sharma

> Best regards,
> Tomasz