[PATCH 1/4] ARM: dts: keystone: update for supporting K2L/K2E EVMs
Olof Johansson
olof at lixom.net
Sun Mar 9 00:39:24 EST 2014
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 04:50:32PM -0500, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> From: Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2 at ti.com>
>
> This patch add compatibility strings for k2hk, k2l and k2e EVMs
>
> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof at lixom.net>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt at kernel.org>
> Cc: Kumar Gala <galak at codeaurora.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2 at ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar at ti.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/keystone/keystone.txt | 10 ++++++++++
> arch/arm/mach-keystone/keystone.c | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/keystone/keystone.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/keystone/keystone.txt
> index 63c0e6a..ad16e7a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/keystone/keystone.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/keystone/keystone.txt
> @@ -8,3 +8,13 @@ Required properties:
> - compatible: All TI specific devices present in Keystone SOC should be in
> the form "ti,keystone-*". Generic devices like gic, arch_timers, ns16550
> type UART should use the specified compatible for those devices.
> +
> +Boards:
> +- Keystone 2 Hawking/Kepler EVM
> + compatible = "ti,k2hk-evm"
> +
> +- Keystone 2 Lamarr EVM
> + compatible = "ti,k2l-evm"
Your previous email said Lammar. One, or maybe both, are wrong, but which one?
> +
> +- Keystone 2 Edison EVM
> + compatible = "ti,k2e-evm"
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-keystone/keystone.c b/arch/arm/mach-keystone/keystone.c
> index 6e6bb7d..aa0d212 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-keystone/keystone.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-keystone/keystone.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ static void __init keystone_init(void)
>
> static const char *keystone_match[] __initconst = {
> "ti,keystone-evm",
> + "ti,k2hk-evm",
> + "ti,k2l-evm",
> + "ti,k2e-evm",
-evm indicate board-level compat fields. We'd be better off just keeping a
"ti,keystone" top-level compatible here and just using that to probe. That
way you don't have to touch the file for new boards in the future.
-Olof
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list