[PATCH] ARM: shmobile: Break out R-Car SYSC PM code
Olof Johansson
olof at lixom.net
Sun Mar 9 00:22:10 EST 2014
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:09:52AM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
> Hi Olof,
>
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:45 PM, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Olof Johansson <olof at lixom.net> wrote:
> >> I spotted this patch since it adds new include/mach contents, comment below:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:43 PM, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> --- /dev/null
> >>> +++ work/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/include/mach/pm-rcar.h 2014-01-15 13:30:38.000000000 +0900
> >>> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
> >>> +#ifndef PM_RCAR_H
> >>> +#define PM_RCAR_H
> >>> +
> >>> +struct rcar_sysc_ch {
> >>> + unsigned long chan_offs;
> >>> + unsigned int chan_bit;
> >>> + unsigned int isr_bit;
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +int rcar_sysc_power_down(struct rcar_sysc_ch *sysc_ch);
> >>> +int rcar_sysc_power_up(struct rcar_sysc_ch *sysc_ch);
> >>> +bool rcar_sysc_power_is_off(struct rcar_sysc_ch *sysc_ch);
> >>> +void __iomem *rcar_sysc_init(phys_addr_t base);
> >>> +
> >>> +#endif /* PM_RCAR_H */
> >>
> >>
> >> These prototypes are only ever used by code in arch/arm/mach-shmobile,
> >> right? There's no reason to expose it to the global include namespace,
> >> and you'll just have to remove it when the platform is converted to
> >> multiplatform.
> >>
> >> So, I suggest moving this to be at arch/arm/mach-shmobile/pm-rcar.h
> >> instead (and included as "pm-rcar.h" instead of <mach/pm-rcar.h>).
> >
> > Thanks for your help with the patches! You are right that these are
> > never used outside mach-shmobile, and moving headers out of "mach"
> > certainly makes sense.
>
> FYI, the following series includes my attempt to address this issue:
>
> [PATCH 00/12] ARM: shmobile: Rework include path for SoC files
> [PATCH 01/12] ARM: shmobile: Add temporary include workaround
> [PATCH 02/12] ARM: shmobile: Rework include path for sh7372
> [PATCH 03/12] ARM: shmobile: Rework include path for sh73a0
> [PATCH 04/12] ARM: shmobile: Rework include path for EMEV2
> [PATCH 05/12] ARM: shmobile: Rework include path for r8a7740
> [PATCH 06/12] ARM: shmobile: Rework include path for r8a7778
> [PATCH 07/12] ARM: shmobile: Rework include path for r8a7779
> [PATCH 08/12] ARM: shmobile: Rework include path for r8a7790
> [PATCH 09/12] ARM: shmobile: Rework include path for r8a7791
> [PATCH 10/12] ARM: shmobile: Rework include path for r8a73a4
> [PATCH 11/12] ARM: shmobile: Rework include path for r7s72100
> [PATCH 12/12] ARM: shmobile: Rework include path for common bits
>
> If you would like me to rework the code somehow then please let me
> know. I also intend to ask a different developer to convert the actual
> boards once these changes have been merged by Simon, hope this is a
> good way forward for you.
It certainly looks like a good way forward, thanks for doing this.
(Apologies for the delay in response, I've been ignoring my upstream email for
a while and I'm dealing with the backlog now)
-Olof
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list