[PATCH] i2c: mv64xxx: Fix compilation breakage
Maxime Ripard
maxime.ripard at free-electrons.com
Fri Mar 7 12:19:32 EST 2014
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 04:08:36PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 03:59:30PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > @@ -900,7 +902,8 @@ mv64xxx_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pd)
> > exit_free_irq:
> > free_irq(drv_data->irq, drv_data);
> > exit_reset:
> > - if (pd->dev.of_node && !IS_ERR(drv_data->rstc))
> > + if (pd->dev.of_node && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RESET_CONTROLLER) &&
> > + !IS_ERR(drv_data->rstc))
> > reset_control_assert(drv_data->rstc);
>
> Another question is... why do we need to check pd->dev.of_node here?
> If CONFIG_RESET_CONTROLLER is set, we always try to get the reset
> controller node, so drv_data->rstc is either going to be a valid
> pointer, or it's going to be an error pointer - neither
> reset_control_get() nor devm_reset_control_get return NULL.
Hmmm, right. I'll fix this in a later version.
Wolfram, do you want me to respin the patch making use of
reset_get_optional introduced by Philip in its other mail?
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140307/e5889c10/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list