[PATCH V3 00/12] CCF support for Renesas r7s72100

[Wolfram Sang]

> > That would have saved only 2 lines since we need the workaround anyhow
> > (MTU2) and would break the incremental approach of this series somewhat.
> > I'd like to keep it.
> 
> It would have saved one patch. If Simon needs to apply CCF support separately 
> I'm fine with that approach, but if both changes are applied at the same time 
> the SCIF patches could go in first.

Which one would be saved? We need to workaround anyhow (patch 5) and
some scif cleanup besides the workaround is needed, too (patch 7). No?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140307/b306629e/attachment-0001.sig>