[PATCH v6 2/2] ARM hibernation / suspend-to-disk
Sebastian Capella
sebastian.capella at linaro.org
Tue Mar 4 04:55:31 EST 2014
Quoting Sebastian Capella (2014-02-28 15:38:54)
> Quoting Lorenzo Pieralisi (2014-02-28 14:49:33)
> > On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 08:15:57PM +0000, Sebastian Capella wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This does not guarantee your stack is 8-byte aligned, that's not AAPCS
> > > > compliant and might buy you trouble.
> > > >
> > > > Either you align the stack or you align the pointer you are passing.
> > > >
> > > > Please have a look at kernel/process.c
> > >
> > > I've added this for now, do you see any issues?
> > >
> > > -static u8 resume_stack[PAGE_SIZE/2] __nosavedata;
> > > +static u64 resume_stack[PAGE_SIZE/2/sizeof(u64)] __nosavedata;
> > > - resume_stack + sizeof(resume_stack));
> > > + resume_stack + ARRAY_SIZE(resume_stack));
> >
> > I do not see why the stack depends on the PAGE_SIZE. I would be surprised
> > if you need more than a few bytes (given that soft_restart switches stack
> > again...), go through it with a debugger, it is easy to check the stack
> > usage and allow for some extra buffer (but half a page is not needed).
>
> I assuming this is becase the no-save region is one page anyway (we skip
> restoring the no-save region physical page). So maybe 1/2 is a way to
> leave some room for whatever else may need to be here, but in any case
> the 4k is used for nosave. I think you're right that it can be much less.
Hi Lorenzo,
Are you ok with this just being half a page? Or do you want me to try
to reduce the stack size? I am at Connect without my debugger, so in
that case it would have to wait until next week.
The change for alignment is in as discussed.
Thanks!
Sebastian
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list