[PATCH 3/3] mmc: dw_mmc: Support voltage changes

Seungwon Jeon tgih.jun at samsung.com
Fri Jun 27 04:18:26 PDT 2014


Hi Yuvaraj,

On Fri, June 27, 2014, Yuvaraj Kumar wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Doug Anderson <dianders at chromium.org> wrote:
> > Seungwon,
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 3:41 AM, Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun at samsung.com> wrote:
> >> On Thu, June 26, 2014, Doug Anderson wrote:
> >>> Seungwon,
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 6:08 AM, Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun at samsung.com> wrote:
> >>> > On Mon, June 23, 2014, Yuvaraj Kumar C D wrote:
> >>> >> Subject: [PATCH 3/3] mmc: dw_mmc: Support voltage changes
> >>> >>
> >>> >> From: Doug Anderson <dianders at chromium.org>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> For UHS cards we need the ability to switch voltages from 3.3V to
> >>> >> 1.8V.  Add support to the dw_mmc driver to handle this.  Note that
> >>> >> dw_mmc needs a little bit of extra code since the interface needs a
> >>> >> special bit programmed to the CMD register while CMD11 is progressing.
> >>> >> This means adding a few extra states to the state machine to track.
> >>> >
> >>> > Overall new additional states makes it complicated.
> >>> > Can we do that in other way?
> >>>
> >>> That was the best I was able to figure out when I thought this
> >>> through.  If you have ideas for doing it another way I'd imagine that
> >>> Yuvaraj would be happy to take your feedback.
> >> Let's clean up SDMMC_CMD_VOLT_SWITCH.
> >> In turn, we may remove state-handling simply.
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> >> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders at chromium.org>
> >>> >> Signed-off-by: Yuvaraj Kumar C D <yuvaraj.cd at samsung.com>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> ---
> >>> >>  drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c  |  145 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >>> >>  drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h  |    5 +-
> >>> >>  include/linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h |    2 +
> >>> >>  3 files changed, 142 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >>> >>
> >>> >> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> >>> >> index e034bce..38eb548 100644
> >>> >> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> >>> >> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> >>> >> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
> >>> >>  #include <linux/irq.h>
> >>> >>  #include <linux/mmc/host.h>
> >>> >>  #include <linux/mmc/mmc.h>
> >>> >> +#include <linux/mmc/sd.h>
> >>> >>  #include <linux/mmc/sdio.h>
> >>> >>  #include <linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h>
> >>> >>  #include <linux/bitops.h>
> >>> >> @@ -235,10 +236,13 @@ err:
> >>> >>  }
> >>> >>  #endif /* defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS) */
> >>> >>
> >>> >> +static void mci_send_cmd(struct dw_mci_slot *slot, u32 cmd, u32 arg);
> >>> >> +
> >>> >>  static u32 dw_mci_prepare_command(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_command *cmd)
> >>> >>  {
> >>> >>       struct mmc_data *data;
> >>> >>       struct dw_mci_slot *slot = mmc_priv(mmc);
> >>> >> +     struct dw_mci *host = slot->host;
> >>> >>       const struct dw_mci_drv_data *drv_data = slot->host->drv_data;
> >>> >>       u32 cmdr;
> >>> >>       cmd->error = -EINPROGRESS;
> >>> >> @@ -254,6 +258,32 @@ static u32 dw_mci_prepare_command(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_command
> >>> *cmd)
> >>> >>       else if (cmd->opcode != MMC_SEND_STATUS && cmd->data)
> >>> >>               cmdr |= SDMMC_CMD_PRV_DAT_WAIT;
> >>> >>
> >>> >> +     if (cmd->opcode == SD_SWITCH_VOLTAGE) {
> >>> >> +             u32 clk_en_a;
> >>> >> +
> >>> >> +             /* Special bit makes CMD11 not die */
> >>> >> +             cmdr |= SDMMC_CMD_VOLT_SWITCH;
> >>> >> +
> >>> >> +             /* Change state to continue to handle CMD11 weirdness */
> >>> >> +             WARN_ON(slot->host->state != STATE_SENDING_CMD);
> >>> >> +             slot->host->state = STATE_SENDING_CMD11;
> >>> >> +
> >>> >> +             /*
> >>> >> +              * We need to disable clock stop while doing voltage switch
> >>> >> +              * according to 7.4.1.2 Voltage Switch Normal Scenario.
> >>> >> +              *
> >>> >> +              * It's assumed that by the next time the CLKENA is updated
> >>> >> +              * (when we set the clock next) that the voltage change will
> >>> >> +              * be over, so we don't bother setting any bits to synchronize
> >>> >> +              * with dw_mci_setup_bus().
> >>> >> +              */
> >>> >> +             clk_en_a = mci_readl(host, CLKENA);
> >>> >> +             clk_en_a &= ~(SDMMC_CLKEN_LOW_PWR << slot->id);
> >>> >> +             mci_writel(host, CLKENA, clk_en_a);
> >>> >> +             mci_send_cmd(slot, SDMMC_CMD_UPD_CLK |
> >>> >> +                          SDMMC_CMD_PRV_DAT_WAIT, 0);
> >>> > dw_mci_disable_low_power() can be used here.
> >>>
> >>> Ah.  I guess we don't have that locally anymore.  Locally we have variants on:
> >> I'm checking on cjb/mmc branch.
> >>
> >>> * https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3070311/
> >>> * https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3070251/
> >>> * https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3070221/
> >>>
> >>> ...which removed that function.  ...but I guess upstream never picked
> >>> up those patches, huh?  Looking back it looks like you had some
> >>> feedback and it needed another spin but somehow fell off my plate.  :(
> >>>
> >>> Maybe this is something Yuvaraj would like to pick up?
> >> It's long ago. I remember that there is no progress since my last comment.
> >> In case of patch "3070221", I want to pick up for next Kernel.
> >
> > Sounds like Yuvaraj has agreed to look at addressing your comments.  Thanks!
> >
> >
> >>> >> +     }
> >>> >> +
> >>> >>       if (cmd->flags & MMC_RSP_PRESENT) {
> >>> >>               /* We expect a response, so set this bit */
> >>> >>               cmdr |= SDMMC_CMD_RESP_EXP;
> >>> >> @@ -776,11 +806,15 @@ static void dw_mci_setup_bus(struct dw_mci_slot *slot, bool force_clkinit)
> >>> >>       unsigned int clock = slot->clock;
> >>> >>       u32 div;
> >>> >>       u32 clk_en_a;
> >>> >> +     u32 sdmmc_cmd_bits = SDMMC_CMD_UPD_CLK | SDMMC_CMD_PRV_DAT_WAIT;
> >>> >> +
> >>> >> +     /* We must continue to set bit 28 in CMD until the change is complete */
> >>> >> +     if (host->state == STATE_WAITING_CMD11_DONE)
> >>> >> +             sdmmc_cmd_bits |= SDMMC_CMD_VOLT_SWITCH;
> >>> > I didn't get the reason SDMMC_CMD_VOLT_SWITCH is needed during clock update(enable/disable)
> >>> > Can you explain it in details?
> >>>
> >>> Simply put: if I didn't do this then the system hung during voltage
> >>> switch.  It was not documented in the version of the IP manual that I
> >>> had access to and it took me a bunch of digging / trial and error to
> >>> figure this out.  Whatever this bit does internally it's important to
> >>> set it while the voltage change is happening.  Note that this need was
> >>> the whole reason for adding the extra state to the state machine.
> >>>
> >>> Perhaps Yuvaraj can try without it and I'd assume he'll report the
> >>> same freeze.
> >> Clarify the necessity of SDMMC_CMD_VOLT_SWITCH.
> >> As far as I experience, we didn't apply this bit for several projects.
> >
> > I just tried this locally on our ChromeOS 3.8 kernel (which has quite
> > a few backports and matches dw_mmc upstream pretty closely).  When I
> > take out "sdmmc_cmd_bits |= SDMMC_CMD_VOLT_SWITCH" and bootup it fails
> > to bringup WiFi chip.  It prints messages like:
> >
> > [    4.400842] mmc_host mmc1: Timeout sending command (cmd 0x202000
> > arg 0x0 status 0x80202000)
> >
> > I will let Yuvaraj comment about his testing too.
> To make it simple and verify, i have just enabled eMMC and SD channels
> on 3.16-rc1 and tested.
> Without "sdmmc_cmd_bits |= SDMMC_CMD_VOLT_SWITCH" bootup fails.
> [    3.015971] mmc_host mmc1: Timeout sending command (cmd 0x202000
> arg 0x0 status 0x80202000)
> [    3.530974] mmc_host mmc1: Timeout sending command (cmd 0x202000
> arg 0x0 status 0x80202000)
Thank you for test.
Hmm, it failed during clock update, right?.
Can you check HLE interrupt at this time?
I'll investigate for this.

> >
> >
> >>> >> +static int dw_mci_switch_voltage(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios)
> >>> >> +{
> >>> >> +     struct dw_mci_slot *slot = mmc_priv(mmc);
> >>> >> +     struct dw_mci *host = slot->host;
> >>> >> +     u32 uhs;
> >>> >> +     u32 v18 = SDMMC_UHS_18V << slot->id;
> >>> >> +     int min_uv, max_uv;
> >>> >> +     int ret;
> >>> >> +
> >>> >> +     /*
> >>> >> +      * Program the voltage.  Note that some instances of dw_mmc may use
> >>> >> +      * the UHS_REG for this.  For other instances (like exynos) the UHS_REG
> >>> >> +      * does no harm but you need to set the regulator directly.  Try both.
> >>> >> +      */
> >>> >> +     uhs = mci_readl(host, UHS_REG);
> >>> >> +     if (ios->signal_voltage == MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_330) {
> >>> >> +             min_uv = 2700000;
> >>> >> +             max_uv = 3600000;
> >>> >> +             uhs &= ~v18;
> >>> >> +     } else {
> >>> >> +             min_uv = 1700000;
> >>> >> +             max_uv = 1950000;
> >>> >> +             uhs |= v18;
> >>> >> +     }
> >>> >> +     if (!IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vqmmc)) {
> >>> >> +             ret = regulator_set_voltage(mmc->supply.vqmmc, min_uv, max_uv);
> >>> >> +
> >>> >> +             /*
> >>> >> +              * Only complain if regulator claims that it's not in the 1.8V
> >>> >> +              * range.  This avoids a bunch of errors in the case that
> >>> >> +              * we've got a fixed 1.8V regulator but the core SD code still
> >>> >> +              * thinks it ought to try to switch to 3.3 and then back to 1.8
> >>> >> +              */
> >>> >> +             if (ret) {
> >>> > I think if ret is error, printing message and returning error is good.
> >>> > Currently, just returning '0' though it fails.
> >> Any feedback?
> >
> > Whoops, right.  I think you're right that in the case it warns it
> > should also return the error code.  In the case it doesn't warn it
> > shouldn't.  Also: possibly we should use a trick like the mmc core
> > does and use "regulator_count_voltages" to figure out if we're going
> > to be able to switch voltages...
> >
> >>> > Artificially adding SDMMC_INT_CMD_DONE to pending is needed to complete cmd handling?
> >>> > Is there any reason?
> >>>
> >>> I don't remember this for sure since I wrote this a long time ago.
> >>> Maybe it's not needed?  I may have just been modeling on other
> >>> interrupts.
> >> If there is no specific reason, please remove it.
> >
> > OK, we'll see how Yuvaraj's testing goes without it.  My incredibly
> > brief testing in our local Chrome OS 3.8 tree shows that the WiFi is
> > not detected properly if I comment out the line:
> >   dw_mci_cmd_interrupt(host,
> >     pending | SDMMC_INT_CMD_DONE);
> >
> > It may be sufficient to simply schedule the tasklet or to do some
> > other subset of dw_mci_cmd_interrupt().  Yuvaraj can confirm on the
> > latest kernel and also investigate further.
How about completing CMD without SDMMC_INT_CMD_DONE?

Thanks,
Seungwon Jeon




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list