[PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: cpu0: Extend support beyond CPU0

[Viresh Kumar]

On 27 June 2014 07:23, Mike Turquette <mturquette at linaro.org> wrote:
>> but it isn't future-proof if/when the clock framework starts returning
>> dynamically allocated clock pointers for each clk_get() invocation.
>> Maybe we need a function in the common clock framework that tells us if
>> the clocks are the same either via DT or by taking two clock pointers?
>
> I looked through the patch briefly and did not see why we would need to
> do this. Any hint?

We want to know which CPUs are sharing clock line, so that we can
fill affected-cpus field of cpufreq core.