[PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: cpu0: Extend support beyond CPU0
Viresh Kumar
viresh.kumar at linaro.org
Thu Jun 26 03:52:46 PDT 2014
On 26 June 2014 00:32, Stephen Boyd <sboyd at codeaurora.org> wrote:
> I don't think this driver should be using regulator_get_optional() (Mark
> B. please correct me if I'm wrong). I doubt a supply is actually
> optional for CPUs, just some DTs aren't specifying them. In those cases,
> the regulator core will insert a dummy supply and the code will work
> without having to check for probe defer and error pointers.
Hi Stephen,
Thanks for your comments.
Leaving the above one, I have tried to fix all you mentioned. And it surely
looks much better now.
I would like to wait for a day or two before sending V2, as people might
be reviewing it and the above issue is still wide open..
But in case you wanna test it (completely changed I must say, but
for good), its here:
git://git.linaro.org/people/viresh.kumar/linux.git cpufreq/cpu0-krait-v2
Let me know if you still find it childish :)
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list