[PATCH] clk: tegra: fix vi_sensor clocks on Tegra124

[Stephen Warren]

On 06/25/2014 10:10 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> vi_sensor and vi_sensor2 have a wrong hw clkid on Tegra124. Fix this by
> correcting the hw clkid for Tegra124 and creating the Tegra114 vi_sensor clock
> from its own data. Tegra124 was also using the wrong internal clock id.

> diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra-periph.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra-periph.c

> -	MUX("vi_sensor2", mux_pllm_pllc2_c_c3_pllp_plla, CLK_SOURCE_VI_SENSOR2, 20, TEGRA_PERIPH_NO_RESET, tegra_clk_vi_sensor2),
> +	MUX("vi_sensor2", mux_pllm_pllc2_c_c3_pllp_plla, CLK_SOURCE_VI_SENSOR2, 165, TEGRA_PERIPH_NO_RESET, tegra_clk_vi_sensor2),
...
> -	MUX8("vi_sensor", mux_pllm_pllc2_c_c3_pllp_plla, CLK_SOURCE_VI_SENSOR, 20, TEGRA_PERIPH_NO_RESET, tegra_clk_vi_sensor_8),
> +	MUX8("vi_sensor", mux_pllm_pllc2_c_c3_pllp_plla, CLK_SOURCE_VI_SENSOR, 164, TEGRA_PERIPH_NO_RESET, tegra_clk_vi_sensor_8),

If I'm reading the TRM right, these are CAM_MCLK/CAM_MCLK2 in the
RST_DEV_X register. Is the TRM simply inconsistent in the naming of
these clocks, or is there some other inconsistency?

> diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra114.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra114.c

> @@ -777,7 +784,6 @@ static struct tegra_clk tegra114_clks[tegra_clk_max] __initdata = {
>  	[tegra_clk_spdif_in] = { .dt_id = TEGRA114_CLK_SPDIF_IN, .present = true },
>  	[tegra_clk_spdif_out] = { .dt_id = TEGRA114_CLK_SPDIF_OUT, .present = true },
>  	[tegra_clk_vi_8] = { .dt_id = TEGRA114_CLK_VI, .present = true },
> -	[tegra_clk_vi_sensor_8] = { .dt_id = TEGRA114_CLK_VI_SENSOR, .present = true },

Does it make any sense to
s/tegra_clk_vi_sensor_8/tegra_clk_vi_sensor_114/ and put the definition
into the table in clk-tegra-periph.c instead? I suppose if this clock
definition is specific to Tegra114 there's not much point, so this is
probably fine. Hopefully the new tegra_clk_vi_sensor_8 lasts longer than
just Tegra124...

So overall, I think:
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren at nvidia.com>