[PATCH 05/14] ARM: shmobile: Mark all SoCs in shmobile as CPUFreq, capable

[Simon Horman]

On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 02:26:24PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Simon Horman
> <horms+renesas at verge.net.au> wrote:
> > From: Benoit Cousson <bcousson at baylibre.com>
> >
> > Mark all SoCs in shmobile as CPUFreq capable
> > on multiplatform build only.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson <bcousson at baylibre.com>
> > [gaku.inami.xw at bp.renesas.com: Move the definition of cpufreq capable]
> > Signed-off-by: Gaku Inami <gaku.inami.xw at bp.renesas.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas at verge.net.au>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/mach-shmobile/Kconfig | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/Kconfig
> > index dbd954e..c32fa7c 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/Kconfig
> > @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ config ARCH_SHMOBILE_MULTI
> >         select NO_IOPORT_MAP
> >         select PINCTRL
> >         select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
> > +       select ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ
> > +       select ARCH_HAS_OPP
> 
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/2/714
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/356780/

I believe this patch was queued up before those patches hit Linus's tree.

In the case of ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ, a subsequent patch in
this pull-request, "ARM: shmobile: Remove ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ config for shmobile",
removes it.

Inami-san, could you see about making a patch to remove ARCH_HAS_OPP too?