[PATCH] ARM: make it easier to check the CPU part number correctly
Nicolas Pitre
nico at fluxnic.net
Tue Jun 24 12:36:43 PDT 2014
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> Ensure that platform maintainers check the CPU part number in the right
> manner: the CPU part number is meaningless without also checking the
> CPU implement(e|o)r (choose your preferred spelling!) Provide an
> interface which returns both the implementer and part number together,
> and update the definitions to include the implementer.
>
> Mark the old function as being deprecated... indeed, using the old
> function with the definitions will now always evaluate as false, so
> people must update their un-merged code to the new function. While
> this could be avoided by adding new definitions, we'd also have to
> create new names for them which would be awkward.
>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel at arm.linux.org.uk>
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico at linaro.org>
Please if you could update patch #8082 and #8083 accordingly when
merging them that would be great.
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/cputype.h | 37 +++++++++++++++--------
> arch/arm/include/asm/smp_scu.h | 2 +-
> arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
> arch/arm/kvm/guest.c | 8 +----
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/mcpm-exynos.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c | 4 +--
> arch/arm/mach-vexpress/tc2_pm.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h | 5 ++++
> drivers/clocksource/arm_global_timer.c | 2 +-
> 10 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/cputype.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/cputype.h
> index 8c2b7321a478..963a2515906d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/cputype.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/cputype.h
> @@ -62,17 +62,18 @@
> #define ARM_CPU_IMP_ARM 0x41
> #define ARM_CPU_IMP_INTEL 0x69
>
> -#define ARM_CPU_PART_ARM1136 0xB360
> -#define ARM_CPU_PART_ARM1156 0xB560
> -#define ARM_CPU_PART_ARM1176 0xB760
> -#define ARM_CPU_PART_ARM11MPCORE 0xB020
> -#define ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A8 0xC080
> -#define ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9 0xC090
> -#define ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A5 0xC050
> -#define ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A15 0xC0F0
> -#define ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A7 0xC070
> -#define ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A12 0xC0D0
> -#define ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A17 0xC0E0
> +/* ARM implemented processors */
> +#define ARM_CPU_PART_ARM1136 0x4100b360
> +#define ARM_CPU_PART_ARM1156 0x4100b560
> +#define ARM_CPU_PART_ARM1176 0x4100b760
> +#define ARM_CPU_PART_ARM11MPCORE 0x4100b020
> +#define ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A8 0x4100c080
> +#define ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9 0x4100c090
> +#define ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A5 0x4100c050
> +#define ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A7 0x4100c070
> +#define ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A12 0x4100c0d0
> +#define ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A17 0x4100c0e0
> +#define ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A15 0x4100c0f0
>
> #define ARM_CPU_XSCALE_ARCH_MASK 0xe000
> #define ARM_CPU_XSCALE_ARCH_V1 0x2000
> @@ -171,14 +172,24 @@ static inline unsigned int __attribute_const__ read_cpuid_implementor(void)
> return (read_cpuid_id() & 0xFF000000) >> 24;
> }
>
> -static inline unsigned int __attribute_const__ read_cpuid_part_number(void)
> +/*
> + * The CPU part number is meaningless without referring to the CPU
> + * implementer: implementers are free to define their own part numbers
> + * which are permitted to clash with other implementer part numbers.
> + */
> +static inline unsigned int __attribute_const__ read_cpuid_part(void)
> +{
> + return read_cpuid_id() & 0xff00fff0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline unsigned int __attribute_const__ __deprecated read_cpuid_part_number(void)
> {
> return read_cpuid_id() & 0xFFF0;
> }
>
> static inline unsigned int __attribute_const__ xscale_cpu_arch_version(void)
> {
> - return read_cpuid_part_number() & ARM_CPU_XSCALE_ARCH_MASK;
> + return read_cpuid_id() & ARM_CPU_XSCALE_ARCH_MASK;
> }
>
> static inline unsigned int __attribute_const__ read_cpuid_cachetype(void)
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/smp_scu.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/smp_scu.h
> index 0393fbab8dd5..bfe163c40024 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/smp_scu.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/smp_scu.h
> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
>
> static inline bool scu_a9_has_base(void)
> {
> - return read_cpuid_part_number() == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9;
> + return read_cpuid_part() == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9;
> }
>
> static inline unsigned long scu_a9_get_base(void)
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c
> index af9e35e8836f..c02c2e8c877d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c
> @@ -250,40 +250,38 @@ static struct platform_device_id cpu_pmu_plat_device_ids[] = {
> static int probe_current_pmu(struct arm_pmu *pmu)
> {
> int cpu = get_cpu();
> - unsigned long implementor = read_cpuid_implementor();
> - unsigned long part_number = read_cpuid_part_number();
> int ret = -ENODEV;
>
> pr_info("probing PMU on CPU %d\n", cpu);
>
> + switch (read_cpuid_part()) {
> /* ARM Ltd CPUs. */
> - if (implementor == ARM_CPU_IMP_ARM) {
> - switch (part_number) {
> - case ARM_CPU_PART_ARM1136:
> - case ARM_CPU_PART_ARM1156:
> - case ARM_CPU_PART_ARM1176:
> - ret = armv6pmu_init(pmu);
> - break;
> - case ARM_CPU_PART_ARM11MPCORE:
> - ret = armv6mpcore_pmu_init(pmu);
> - break;
> - case ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A8:
> - ret = armv7_a8_pmu_init(pmu);
> - break;
> - case ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9:
> - ret = armv7_a9_pmu_init(pmu);
> - break;
> - }
> - /* Intel CPUs [xscale]. */
> - } else if (implementor == ARM_CPU_IMP_INTEL) {
> - switch (xscale_cpu_arch_version()) {
> - case ARM_CPU_XSCALE_ARCH_V1:
> - ret = xscale1pmu_init(pmu);
> - break;
> - case ARM_CPU_XSCALE_ARCH_V2:
> - ret = xscale2pmu_init(pmu);
> - break;
> + case ARM_CPU_PART_ARM1136:
> + case ARM_CPU_PART_ARM1156:
> + case ARM_CPU_PART_ARM1176:
> + ret = armv6pmu_init(pmu);
> + break;
> + case ARM_CPU_PART_ARM11MPCORE:
> + ret = armv6mpcore_pmu_init(pmu);
> + break;
> + case ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A8:
> + ret = armv7_a8_pmu_init(pmu);
> + break;
> + case ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9:
> + ret = armv7_a9_pmu_init(pmu);
> + break;
> + default:
> + if (read_cpuid_implementor() == ARM_CPU_IMP_INTEL) {
> + switch (xscale_cpu_arch_version()) {
> + case ARM_CPU_XSCALE_ARCH_V1:
> + ret = xscale1pmu_init(pmu);
> + break;
> + case ARM_CPU_XSCALE_ARCH_V2:
> + ret = xscale2pmu_init(pmu);
> + break;
> + }
> }
> + break;
> }
>
> put_cpu();
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm/kvm/guest.c
> index b23a59c1c522..70bf49b8b244 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/guest.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/guest.c
> @@ -274,13 +274,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_sregs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>
> int __attribute_const__ kvm_target_cpu(void)
> {
> - unsigned long implementor = read_cpuid_implementor();
> - unsigned long part_number = read_cpuid_part_number();
> -
> - if (implementor != ARM_CPU_IMP_ARM)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> - switch (part_number) {
> + switch (read_cpuid_part()) {
> case ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A7:
> return KVM_ARM_TARGET_CORTEX_A7;
> case ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A15:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mcpm-exynos.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mcpm-exynos.c
> index 0498d0b887ef..5cb0c9d60825 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mcpm-exynos.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mcpm-exynos.c
> @@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ static void exynos_power_down(void)
> if (last_man && __mcpm_outbound_enter_critical(cpu, cluster)) {
> arch_spin_unlock(&exynos_mcpm_lock);
>
> - if (read_cpuid_part_number() == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A15) {
> + if (read_cpuid_part() == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A15) {
> /*
> * On the Cortex-A15 we need to disable
> * L2 prefetching before flushing the cache.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c
> index 1c8d31e39520..8dc1d3a3a8bf 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c
> @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ static void __init exynos_smp_init_cpus(void)
> void __iomem *scu_base = scu_base_addr();
> unsigned int i, ncores;
>
> - if (read_cpuid_part_number() == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9)
> + if (read_cpuid_part() == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9)
> ncores = scu_base ? scu_get_core_count(scu_base) : 1;
> else
> /*
> @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static void __init exynos_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
>
> exynos_sysram_init();
>
> - if (read_cpuid_part_number() == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9)
> + if (read_cpuid_part() == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9)
> scu_enable(scu_base_addr());
>
> /*
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/tc2_pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/tc2_pm.c
> index b743a0ae02ce..154669ccaca6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/tc2_pm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/tc2_pm.c
> @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ static void tc2_pm_down(u64 residency)
> if (last_man && __mcpm_outbound_enter_critical(cpu, cluster)) {
> arch_spin_unlock(&tc2_pm_lock);
>
> - if (read_cpuid_part_number() == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A15) {
> + if (read_cpuid_part() == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A15) {
> /*
> * On the Cortex-A15 we need to disable
> * L2 prefetching before flushing the cache.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c b/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c
> index c012a673b4ef..948f12cf6180 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c
> @@ -733,7 +733,7 @@ static int l2c310_cpu_enable_flz(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long act, v
> static void __init l2c310_enable(void __iomem *base, u32 aux, unsigned num_lock)
> {
> unsigned rev = readl_relaxed(base + L2X0_CACHE_ID) & L2X0_CACHE_ID_PART_MASK;
> - bool cortex_a9 = read_cpuid_part_number() == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9;
> + bool cortex_a9 = read_cpuid_part() == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9;
>
> if (rev >= L310_CACHE_ID_RTL_R2P0) {
> if (cortex_a9) {
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_global_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_global_timer.c
> index 60e5a170c4d2..e6833771a716 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_global_timer.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_global_timer.c
> @@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ static void __init global_timer_of_register(struct device_node *np)
> * fire when the timer value is greater than or equal to. In previous
> * revisions the comparators fired when the timer value was equal to.
> */
> - if (read_cpuid_part_number() == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9
> + if (read_cpuid_part() == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9
> && (read_cpuid_id() & 0xf0000f) < 0x200000) {
> pr_warn("global-timer: non support for this cpu version.\n");
> return;
>
> --
> FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: now at 9.7Mbps down 460kbps up... slowly
> improving, and getting towards what was expected from it.
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list