VFP handling in multiplatform feroceon kernels
Nicolas Pitre
nicolas.pitre at linaro.org
Tue Jun 24 07:49:23 PDT 2014
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 03:04:14PM +0100, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Jun 2014, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 02:17:06PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > Since 3.16, we have the ability to build a multiplatform kernel
> > > > that includes both kirkwood (feroceon) and some other ARMv5 CPU.
> > > >
> > > > I accidentally stumbled over a bug in the VFP code that looks
> > > > like it will break at least ARM9 VFP support if CPU_FEROCEON
> > > > is also enabled, introduced by this (old) commit:
> > >
> > > I would argue that the bug is in the CPU (feroceon). See the end of this
> > > email:
> > >
> > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg41460.html
> > >
> > > and my follow-up. Basically you can't avoid the conditional compilation
> > > as Feroceon doesn't follow the VFP sub-architecture spec and doesn't
> > > present itself as a different CPU from an _ARM_ 9. Unless things have
> > > changed with Marvell's hardware implementation and they got a new id, I
> > > suggest you don't enable this for multi-platform.
> >
> > Only the early revision did hijack the ARM9 ID but still. We certainly
> > can determine at run time if the platform being booted is equiped with a
> > Feroceon before user space is started. In that case I'd suggest some
> > runtime code patching to branch to some out-of-line assembly code for
> > Feroceon.
>
> You don't even need to branch to out of line assembly, just branch over
> the imprecise VFP abort handling in arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S.
Even better. I looked too quickly at the patch seeing a #ifdef while it
is in fact #ifndef.
What about something like this?
diff --git a/arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S b/arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S
index be807625ed..d46eb84884 100644
--- a/arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S
+++ b/arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ ENTRY(vfp_support_entry)
beq vfp_reload_hw @ then the hw state needs reloading
VFPFSTMIA r4, r5 @ save the working registers
VFPFMRX r5, FPSCR @ current status
-#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_FEROCEON
+vfp_extra:
tst r1, #FPEXC_EX @ is there additional state to save?
beq 1f
VFPFMRX r6, FPINST @ FPINST (only if FPEXC.EX is set)
@@ -123,7 +123,6 @@ ENTRY(vfp_support_entry)
beq 1f
VFPFMRX r8, FPINST2 @ FPINST2 if needed (and present)
1:
-#endif
stmia r4, {r1, r5, r6, r8} @ save FPEXC, FPSCR, FPINST, FPINST2
vfp_reload_hw:
@@ -219,6 +218,19 @@ process_exception:
@ retry the faulted instruction
ENDPROC(vfp_support_entry)
+#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FEROCEON
+ENTRY(vfp_feroceon_quirk)
+ /* force a skip over the imprecise VFP abort handling */
+ adr r0, vfp_extra
+ ldr r1, .L_eq_insn
+ str r1, [r0]
+ add r1, r0, #4
+ b feroceon_coherent_kern_range
+.L_eq_insn:
+ teq r0, r0
+ENDPROC(vfp_feroceon_quirk)
+#endif
+
ENTRY(vfp_save_state)
@ Save the current VFP state
@ r0 - save location
Then suffice to call vfp_feroceon_quirk() during boot when appropriate.
Nicolas
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list