[PATCH v2 2/8] PCI: designware: refactor host init code to re-use on v3.65 DW pci hw
Pratyush Anand
pratyush.anand at st.com
Sun Jun 22 22:05:48 PDT 2014
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 02:47:27AM +0800, Murali Karicheri wrote:
> On 6/18/2014 3:05 AM, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> > Hi Murali,
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 02:51:21AM +0800, Murali Karicheri wrote:
[...]
> Pratyush,
>
> Thanks for the comments.
>
> This is IP specific code and another driver that has this version of the
> IP will be able to
> re-use the code. This is also being discussed in another thread from
> Bjorn and Jingoo.
Anything which is implemented in application space, will not be same
across all IP users. For example, you have MSI0_IRQ_ENABLE_SET at
offset 0x108 in application space.Other vendor may not have this
register at the same offset. Moreover, other vendors are not even
obliged to implement MSI Enable signals in same way, so internal bit
definition of the register may change.
In summary: Code is only reusable if all register offset and bit
definitions are same across vendors. In case of DW driver none of the
code which are accessed using va_app_base should go to common area.
> Please discuss this in that thread.
Sorry, I am not following pci mailing list. Doing something else these
days. So if you can help me with the thread link.
Regards
Pratyush
>
> >> initialization code. So refactor the msi host controller code into a
> >> separate function. Other common functions across both hw versions
> >> are moved to dw_pcie_common_host_init() and called from the newer and
> >> v3.65 hw host initialization code.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2 at ti.com>
> >>
> >> CC: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar at ti.com>
> >> CC: Russell King <linux at arm.linux.org.uk>
> >> CC: Grant Likely <grant.likely at linaro.org>
> >> CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt at kernel.org>
> >> CC: Mohit Kumar <mohit.kumar at st.com>
> >> CC: Jingoo Han <jg1.han at samsung.com>
> >> CC: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas at google.com>
> >> CC: Pratyush Anand <pratyush.anand at st.com>
> >> CC: Richard Zhu <r65037 at freescale.com>
> >> CC: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon at ti.com>
> >> CC: Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>
> >> CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>
> >> CC: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll at arm.com>
> >> CC: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>
> >> CC: Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree at hellion.org.uk>
> >> CC: Kumar Gala <galak at codeaurora.org>
> >> CC: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap at infradead.org>
> >> CC: Grant Likely <grant.likely at linaro.org>
> >>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c | 136 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> >> 1 file changed, 101 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
> >> index e8f5d8d..e4bd19a 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
> >> @@ -389,13 +389,19 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops msi_domain_ops = {
> >> .map = dw_pcie_msi_map,
> >> };
> >>
> >> -int __init dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
> >> +/*
> >> + * dw_pcie_parse_resource() - Function to parse common resources
> >> + *
> >> + * @pp: ptr to pcie port
> >> + *
> >> + * Parse the range property for MEM, IO and cfg resources, and map
> >> + * the cfg register space.
> >> + */
> > Why do you need this function? If you have some extra resource, you
> > can ioremap that before you call dw_pcie_host_init.
>
> I assume you are referring to dw_pcie_parse_resource(). Keystone PCIe
> driver needs
> this to parse the range property for IORESOURCE_MEM and IORESOURCE_IO
> resources.
> So refactored this into a function and called from host_init()
> code for v3.65 and dw_pcie_host_init . But for Keystone PCI driver, no
> need to ioremap
> cfg1 and cfg2 as it doesn't have ATU ports. So host_init() code has to
> be little different.
> Idea is to have IP specific host_init() and refactor and re-use the
> common code on both.
>
> >
> >> +int __init dw_pcie_parse_resource(struct pcie_port *pp)
> >> {
> >> struct device_node *np = pp->dev->of_node;
> >> struct of_pci_range range;
> >> struct of_pci_range_parser parser;
> >> - u32 val;
> >> - int i;
> >>
> >> if (of_pci_range_parser_init(&parser, np)) {
> >> dev_err(pp->dev, "missing ranges property\n");
> >> @@ -431,41 +437,29 @@ int __init dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
> >> pp->config.cfg1_size = resource_size(&pp->cfg)/2;
> >> }
> >> }
> >> -
> >> - if (!pp->dbi_base) {
> >> - pp->dbi_base = devm_ioremap(pp->dev, pp->cfg.start,
> >> - resource_size(&pp->cfg));
> >> - if (!pp->dbi_base) {
> >> - dev_err(pp->dev, "error with ioremap\n");
> >> - return -ENOMEM;
> >> - }
> >> - }
> >> -
> >> - pp->cfg0_base = pp->cfg.start;
> >> - pp->cfg1_base = pp->cfg.start + pp->config.cfg0_size;
> >> pp->mem_base = pp->mem.start;
> >>
> >> - pp->va_cfg0_base = devm_ioremap(pp->dev, pp->cfg0_base,
> >> - pp->config.cfg0_size);
> >> - if (!pp->va_cfg0_base) {
> >> - dev_err(pp->dev, "error with ioremap in function\n");
> >> - return -ENOMEM;
> >> - }
> >> - pp->va_cfg1_base = devm_ioremap(pp->dev, pp->cfg1_base,
> >> - pp->config.cfg1_size);
> >> - if (!pp->va_cfg1_base) {
> >> - dev_err(pp->dev, "error with ioremap\n");
> >> - return -ENOMEM;
> >> - }
> >> + return 0;
> >> +}
> >>
> >> - if (of_property_read_u32(np, "num-lanes", &pp->lanes)) {
> >> - dev_err(pp->dev, "Failed to parse the number of lanes\n");
> >> - return -EINVAL;
> >> - }
> >> +/*
> >> + * dw_pcie_msi_host_init() - Function to initialize msi host controller
> >> + *
> >> + * @pp: ptr to pcie port
> >> + * @np: device node ptr to msi irq controller
> >> + * @irq_msi_ops: ptr to MSI irq_domain_ops struct
> >> + *
> >> + * Function register irq domain for msi irq controller and create mappings
> >> + * for MSI irqs.
> >> + */
> >
> > May be you can only do following to support your MSI chip:
> >
> > Initialize pp->irq_domain into your add_pcie_port function before you
> > call dw_pcie_host_init.
> >
> > In dw_pcie_host_init,
> >
> > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI) && !pp->irq_domain)
>
> How do I pass the keystone specific msi irq_domain_ops? It looks clean
> the way it is implemented
> in this patch. Also since MSI host controller and legacy host controller
> are different, it make
> sense to add separate host_init for each. Let me know.
>
> Regards,
>
> Murali
>
> >
> >> +int dw_pcie_msi_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp, struct device_node *np,
> >> + const struct irq_domain_ops *irq_msi_ops)
> >> +{
> >> + int i;
> >>
> >> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI)) {
> >> pp->irq_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(pp->dev->of_node,
> >> - MAX_MSI_IRQS, &msi_domain_ops,
> >> + MAX_MSI_IRQS, irq_msi_ops,
> >> &dw_pcie_msi_chip);
> >> if (!pp->irq_domain) {
> >> dev_err(pp->dev, "irq domain init failed\n");
> >> @@ -476,6 +470,29 @@ int __init dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
> >> irq_create_mapping(pp->irq_domain, i);
> >> }
> >>
> >> + return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +/*
> >> + * dw_pcie_common_host_init() - common host init function across different
> >> + * versions of the designware PCI controller.
> >> + * @pp: ptr to pcie port
> >> + * @hw: ptr to hw_pci structure
> >> + *
> >> + * This functions parses common DT properties, call host_init() callback
> >> + * of the PCI controller driver. Also initialize the common RC configurations
> >> + * and call common pci core function to intialize the controller driver.
> >> + */
> >> +int __init dw_pcie_common_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp, struct hw_pci *hw)
> >> +{
> >> + struct device_node *np = pp->dev->of_node;
> >> + u32 val;
> >> +
> >> + if (of_property_read_u32(np, "num-lanes", &pp->lanes)) {
> >> + dev_err(pp->dev, "Failed to parse the number of lanes\n");
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> if (pp->ops->host_init)
> >> pp->ops->host_init(pp);
> >>
> >> @@ -488,10 +505,10 @@ int __init dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
> >> val |= PORT_LOGIC_SPEED_CHANGE;
> >> dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL, 4, val);
> >>
> >> - dw_pci.nr_controllers = 1;
> >> - dw_pci.private_data = (void **)&pp;
> >> + hw->nr_controllers = 1;
> >> + hw->private_data = (void **)&pp;
> >>
> >> - pci_common_init_dev(pp->dev, &dw_pci);
> >> + pci_common_init_dev(pp->dev, hw);
> >> pci_assign_unassigned_resources();
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS
> >> dw_pci.domain++;
> >> @@ -500,6 +517,55 @@ int __init dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +/*
> >> + * dw_pcie_host_init() - Host init function for new designware h/w
> >> + *
> >> + * @pp: ptr to pcie port
> >> + *
> >> + * The function parse the PCI resurces for IO, Memory and map the config
> >> + * space addresses. Also initliaze the MSI irq controller and call
> >> + * dw_pcie_common_host_init() to initialize the PCI controller.
> >> + */
> >> +int __init dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
> >> +{
> >> + int ret;
> >> +
> >> + ret = dw_pcie_parse_resource(pp);
> >> + if (ret)
> >> + return ret;
> >> +
> >> + if (!pp->dbi_base) {
> >> + pp->dbi_base = devm_ioremap(pp->dev, pp->cfg.start,
> >> + resource_size(&pp->cfg));
> >> + if (!pp->dbi_base) {
> >> + dev_err(pp->dev, "error with ioremap\n");
> >> + return -ENOMEM;
> >> + }
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + pp->cfg0_base = pp->cfg.start;
> >> + pp->cfg1_base = pp->cfg.start + pp->config.cfg0_size;
> >> +
> >> + pp->va_cfg0_base = devm_ioremap(pp->dev, pp->cfg0_base,
> >> + pp->config.cfg0_size);
> >> + if (!pp->va_cfg0_base) {
> >> + dev_err(pp->dev, "error with ioremap in function\n");
> >> + return -ENOMEM;
> >> + }
> >> + pp->va_cfg1_base = devm_ioremap(pp->dev, pp->cfg1_base,
> >> + pp->config.cfg1_size);
> >> + if (!pp->va_cfg1_base) {
> >> + dev_err(pp->dev, "error with ioremap\n");
> >> + return -ENOMEM;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + ret = dw_pcie_msi_host_init(pp, pp->dev->of_node, &msi_domain_ops);
> >> + if (ret < 0)
> >> + return ret;
> >> +
> >> + return dw_pcie_common_host_init(pp, &dw_pci);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> static void dw_pcie_prog_viewport_cfg0(struct pcie_port *pp, u32 busdev)
> >> {
> >> /* Program viewport 0 : OUTBOUND : CFG0 */
> > Regards
> > Pratyush
> >
> >> --
> >> 1.7.9.5
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list