[PATCH 2/2] clocksource: add rockchip-specific armv7-timer setup
Mark Rutland
mark.rutland at arm.com
Fri Jun 20 05:14:50 PDT 2014
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 12:27:26PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Am Freitag, 20. Juni 2014, 11:51:23 schrieb Mark Rutland:
> > On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 11:44:49AM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > > The armv7-timer on Rockchip RK3288 SoCs needs an underlying timer to run.
> > > Therefore the special rockchip,rk3288-armv7-timer does this setup and
> > > then initializes the architected timer using the new locally exposed
> > > arch_timer_init.
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>
> > > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko at sntech.de>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > .../bindings/arm/rockchip/armv7-timer.txt | 22 +++++++++
> > > drivers/clocksource/Makefile | 1 +
> > > drivers/clocksource/rockchip_timer.c | 57
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 80 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip/armv7-timer.txt create
> > > mode 100644 drivers/clocksource/rockchip_timer.c
> > >
> > > diff --git
> > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip/armv7-timer.txt
> > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip/armv7-timer.txt new file
> > > mode 100644
> > > index 0000000..4c1950a
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip/armv7-timer.txt
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
> > > +Rockchip armv7-timer:
> > > +---------------------
> > > +
> > > +The architected timer on rk3288 SoCs has special setup requirements, as
> > > +the cpu-timer block needs to supply the architected timer.
> > > +
> > > +Required node properties:
> > > +- compatible value : = "rockchip,rk3288-armv7-timer";
> > > +- reg : physical base address and the size of the registers window
> > > + of the supplying timer block
> > > +- CP15 Timer node properties as described in bindings/arm/arch_timer.txt
> > > +
> > > +Example:
> > > +
> > > +architected-timer {
> > > + compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-armv7-timer";
> > > + reg = <0xff810020 0x20>;
> > > + interrupts = <GIC_PPI 13 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) |
> > > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>,
> > > + <GIC_PPI 14 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) |
> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>,
> > > + <GIC_PPI 11 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) |
> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>;
> > > + clock-frequency = <24000000>;
> > > +};
> > > diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/Makefile b/drivers/clocksource/Makefile
> > > index 800b130..cbad225 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/clocksource/Makefile
> > > +++ b/drivers/clocksource/Makefile
> > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MARCO) += timer-marco.o
> > >
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MOXART) += moxart_timer.o
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MXS) += mxs_timer.o
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_PRIMA2) += timer-prima2.o
> > >
> > > +obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rockchip_timer.o
> > >
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_U300) += timer-u300.o
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_SUN4I_TIMER) += sun4i_timer.o
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_SUN5I_HSTIMER) += timer-sun5i.o
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/rockchip_timer.c
> > > b/drivers/clocksource/rockchip_timer.c new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000..46c2146
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/drivers/clocksource/rockchip_timer.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
> > > +/*
> > > + * Copyright (c) 2014 MundoReader S.L.
> > > + * Author: Heiko Stuebner <heiko at sntech.de>
> > > + *
> > > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> > > + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> > > + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> > > + * (at your option) any later version.
> > > + *
> > > + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> > > + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> > > + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> > > + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +#include <linux/init.h>
> > > +#include <linux/of.h>
> > > +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> > > +#include <linux/clockchips.h>
> > > +#include "arm_arch_timer.h"
> > > +
> > > +#define TIMER_LOAD_COUNT0 0x00
> > > +#define TIMER_LOAD_COUNT1 0x04
> > > +#define TIMER_CURRENT_VALUE0 0x08
> > > +#define TIMER_CURRENT_VALUE1 0x0c
> > > +#define TIMER_CONTROL_REG 0x10
> > > +#define TIMER_INT_STATUS 0x18
> > > +
> > > +#define TIMER_DISABLE (0 << 0)
> > > +#define TIMER_ENABLE (1 << 0)
> > > +#define TIMER_MODE_FREE_RUNNING (0 << 1)
> > > +#define TIMER_MODE_USER_DEFINED_COUNT (1 << 1)
> > > +#define TIMER_INT_MASK (0 << 2)
> > > +#define TIMER_INT_UNMASK (1 << 2)
> > > +
> > > +static __init void rk3288_arch_timer_init(struct device_node *np)
> > > +{
> > > + void __iomem *reg_base;
> > > +
> > > + reg_base = of_io_request_and_map(np, 0, "rk3288-armv7-timer");
> > > + if (!reg_base) {
> > > + pr_warn("%s: Can't get resource\n", __func__);
> > > + return;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + writel(TIMER_DISABLE, reg_base + TIMER_CONTROL_REG);
> > > +
> > > + writel(0xffffffff, reg_base + TIMER_LOAD_COUNT0);
> > > + writel(0xffffffff, reg_base + TIMER_LOAD_COUNT1);
> > > +
> > > + writel(TIMER_ENABLE | TIMER_MODE_FREE_RUNNING,
> > > + reg_base + TIMER_CONTROL_REG);
> >
> > Given that this is unconditionally set up in this way, could this not be
> > done in the fimrware/bootloader?
> >
> > That way you could also setup CNTFREQ correctly, and virtualisation can
> > just work out of the box.
>
> It always comes back to this :-) . And as always the counter-argument would be
> that I cannot influence the current bootloader, there are already devices
> shipping in this constellation. And of course quite some more SoCs using this
> pattern.
Sure, but we aren't yet supporting the architected timer on those
systems. :)
This isn't so much a pattern as an unholy tapestry of braindead.
> > This looks like a clock driver in disguise...
>
> Yeah, that was my other idea - doing this as a clock. So would you be ok, with
> the arch-timer getting the possibility to handle an optional clock?
I would very much not like to do this, but it is better than a driver
whose sole purpose is to not be a clock driver.
Mark.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list