[PATCHv3 4/4] arm64: Enable TEXT_OFFSET fuzzing

[Will Deacon]

On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:49:23AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> The arm64 Image header contains a text_offset field which bootloaders
> are supposed to read to determine the offset (from a 2MB aligned "start
> of memory" per booting.txt) at which to load the kernel. The offset is
> not well respected by bootloaders at present, and due to the lack of
> variation there is little incentive to support it. This is unfortunate
> for the sake of future kernels where we may wish to vary the text offset
> (even zeroing it).
> 
> This patch adds options to arm64 to enable fuzz-testing of text_offset.
> CONFIG_ARM64_RANDOMIZE_TEXT_OFFSET forces the text offset to a random
> 16-byte aligned value value in the range [0..2MB) upon a build of the
> kernel. It is recommended that distribution kernels enable randomization
> to test bootloaders such that any compliance issues can be fixed early.

[...]

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug
> index 1c1b756..566bf80 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -28,4 +28,20 @@ config PID_IN_CONTEXTIDR
>  	  instructions during context switch. Say Y here only if you are
>  	  planning to use hardware trace tools with this kernel.
>  
> +config ARM64_RANDOMIZE_TEXT_OFFSET
> +	bool "Randomize TEXT_OFFSET at build time (EXPERIMENTAL)"

Lose the (EXPERIMENTAL) suffix -- this already lives under Kconfig.debug.

> +	default N

I think this is redundant.

> +	help
> +	  Say Y here if you want the image load offset (AKA TEXT_OFFSET)
> +	  of the kernel to be randomized at build-time. When selected,
> +	  this option will cause TEXT_OFFSET to be randomized upon any
> +	  build of the kernel, and the offset will be reflected in the
> +	  text_offset field of the resulting Image. This can be used to
> +	  fuzz-test bootloaders which respect text_offset.
> +
> +	  This option is intended for bootloader and/or kernel testing
> +	  only. Bootloaders must make no assumptions regarding the value
> +	  of TEXT_OFFSET and platforms must not require a specific
> +	  value.

Will