[PATCH] ARM: omap: rework platform selection
rob.herring at linaro.org
Mon Jun 16 08:53:17 PDT 2014
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony at atomide.com> wrote:
> * Tony Lindgren <tony at atomide.com> [140616 04:31]:
>> * Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> [140616 04:18]:
>> > Let's see if others have similar opinions Rob's patch as a whole.
>> > I'd still like to keep all the parts aside from the OMAP change
>> > and just back out the change that caused the problems.
>> > Does that seem reasonable to you?
>> Yes makes sense to me if others don't have similar issues. I guess
>> it should be possible to verify that by diffing the generated
>> .config files compared to the old ones.
Other than exynos (which is new to MP) and OMAP, the rest are
straightforward user config to menuconfig conversions.
> If you update Rob's patch and undo the omap2+ changes, you might
> want to fold in something like the following to hide the omap
> options behind a menu.
This or reverting the OMAP part seems like the best change for now.
> So far I have not come up with no great ideas on fixing this
> properly short of requiring all omap .config files to add
> CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP=y manually. Anybody got good ideas for that?
I've failed to come up with anything...
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig
> @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
> +menu "TI OMAP/AM/DM/DRA Family"
> config ARCH_OMAP
> @@ -342,3 +344,5 @@ config OMAP4_ERRATA_I688
More information about the linux-arm-kernel