[PATCH V2 3/3] mmc: mmci: Reverse IRQ handling for the arm_variant
Ulf Hansson
ulf.hansson at linaro.org
Mon Jun 16 01:09:07 PDT 2014
Commit "mmc: mmci: Handle CMD irq before DATA irq", caused an issue
when using the ARM model of the PL181 and running QEMU.
The bug was reported for the following QEMU version:
$ qemu-system-arm -version
QEMU emulator version 2.0.0 (Debian 2.0.0+dfsg-2ubuntu1.1), Copyright
(c) 2003-2008 Fabrice Bellard
To resolve the problem, let's restore the old behavior were the DATA
irq is handled prior the CMD irq, but only for the arm_variant, which
the problem was reported for.
Reported-by: John Stultz <john.stultz at linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell at linaro.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux at arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson at linaro.org>
---
drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c | 12 ++++++++++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c
index 5d20bfba..e4d4707 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c
@@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ static unsigned int fmax = 515633;
* @pwrreg_nopower: bits in MMCIPOWER don't controls ext. power supply
* @explicit_mclk_control: enable explicit mclk control in driver.
* @qcom_fifo: enables qcom specific fifo pio read logic.
+ * @reversed_irq_handling: handle data irq before cmd irq.
*/
struct variant_data {
unsigned int clkreg;
@@ -97,6 +98,7 @@ struct variant_data {
bool pwrreg_nopower;
bool explicit_mclk_control;
bool qcom_fifo;
+ bool reversed_irq_handling;
};
static struct variant_data variant_arm = {
@@ -105,6 +107,7 @@ static struct variant_data variant_arm = {
.datalength_bits = 16,
.pwrreg_powerup = MCI_PWR_UP,
.f_max = 100000000,
+ .reversed_irq_handling = true,
};
static struct variant_data variant_arm_extended_fifo = {
@@ -1236,8 +1239,13 @@ static irqreturn_t mmci_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
dev_dbg(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "irq0 (data+cmd) %08x\n", status);
- mmci_cmd_irq(host, host->cmd, status);
- mmci_data_irq(host, host->data, status);
+ if (host->variant->reversed_irq_handling) {
+ mmci_data_irq(host, host->data, status);
+ mmci_cmd_irq(host, host->cmd, status);
+ } else {
+ mmci_cmd_irq(host, host->cmd, status);
+ mmci_data_irq(host, host->data, status);
+ }
/* Don't poll for busy completion in irq context. */
if (host->busy_status)
--
1.7.9.5
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list