[PATCH v2 2/7] pwm: add support for atmel-hlcdc-pwm device
boris.brezillon at free-electrons.com
Sun Jun 15 07:55:27 PDT 2014
On 15/06/2014 11:11, Jean-Jacques Hiblot wrote:
> On 06/09/2014 06:04 PM, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
>> The HLCDC IP available in some Atmel SoCs (i.e. sam9x5i.e. at91sam9n12,
>> at91sam9x5 family or sama5d3 family) provide a PWM device.
>> This driver add support for this PWM device.
>> Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon at free-electrons.com>
>> .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/atmel-hlcdc-pwm.txt | 40 ++++
>> drivers/pwm/Kconfig | 9 +
>> drivers/pwm/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-hlcdc.c | 216 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> 4 files changed, 266 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/atmel-hlcdc-pwm.txt
>> create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-hlcdc.c
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/atmel-hlcdc-pwm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/atmel-hlcdc-pwm.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..5e2ba87
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/atmel-hlcdc-pwm.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
>> +++ b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
>> @@ -50,6 +50,15 @@ config PWM_ATMEL
>> To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
>> will be called pwm-atmel.
>> +config PWM_ATMEL_HLCDC_PWM
>> + tristate "Atmel HLCDC PWM support"
>> + depends on MFD_ATMEL_HLCDC
> I'd personnaly prefer a 'select' instead of 'depends on' here. Or maybe
> the MFD driver should enabled y defaut for platforms supporting the hlcdc.
I don't have any strong opinion on the "select" vs "depends on" approach.
Does anyone else think we should use a 'select' instead of a 'depends on' ?
I see at least one benefit, we would be able to see the HLCDC_PWM option
even if the HLCDC driver is not enabled.
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
More information about the linux-arm-kernel