[PATCH 4/4] ARM: dts: imx6qdl: Enable CODA960 VPU

[Rob Herring]

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel at pengutronix.de> wrote:
> This patch adds links to the on-chip SRAM and reset controller nodes
> and switches the interrupts. Make the BIT processor interrupt, which exists on
> all variants, the first one. The JPEG unit interrupt, which does not exist on
> i.MX27 and i.MX5 thus is an optional second interrupt.
> Use different compatible strings for i.MX6Q/D and i.MX6S/DL, as they have to
> load separate firmware images for some reason.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel at pengutronix.de>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl.dtsi  |  4 ++++
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi   |  4 ++++
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi | 10 ++++++++--
>  3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl.dtsi
> index 5c5f574..fbbdfca 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl.dtsi
> @@ -110,3 +110,7 @@
>                       "di0_sel", "di1_sel",
>                       "di0", "di1";
>  };
> +
> +&vpu {
> +       compatible = "fsl,imx6dl-vpu", "cnm,coda960";
> +};
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi
> index addd3f8..2c1dbf8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi
> @@ -291,3 +291,7 @@
>                 };
>         };
>  };
> +
> +&vpu {
> +       compatible = "fsl,imx6q-vpu", "cnm,coda960";
> +};
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
> index eca0971..2052303 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
> @@ -315,9 +315,15 @@
>                         };
>
>                         vpu: vpu at 02040000 {
> +                               compatible = "cnm,coda960";
>                                 reg = <0x02040000 0x3c000>;
> -                               interrupts = <0 3 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> -                                            <0 12 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +                               interrupts = <0 12 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> +                                            <0 3 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;

Is there an existing user? This would break things if so.

Rob