[PATCH v2] ARM: shmobile: koelsch: Add support HSCIF1

[Laurent Pinchart]

Hi Simon,

On Friday 13 June 2014 16:43:07 Simon Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 09:01:27AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tuesday 10 June 2014 16:00:48 Simon Horman wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 01:14:27PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> > > > > Koelsch can use HSCIF1 insetead of SCIF1 as serial port. But if we
> > > > > want
> > > > > to use, we will need to disable the GPIO key and remodeling of the
> > > > > board. Therefore status of hscif1 does not set the "okay".
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro.iwamatsu.yj at renesas.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > 
> > > > >  V2: Remove hscif1_clk from renesas,groups. This pin does not use.
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks for updating the patch. This looks fine to me.
> > > > 
> > > > Acked-by: Magnus Damm <damm+renesas at opensource.se>
> > > 
> > > Thanks, I will queue this up.
> > 
> > Sorry for the late reply, but I have some doubts about this. The HRX0 and
> > HTX0 signals are connected to push buttons and used as GPIOs. Beside,
> > they're not routed to serial port transceiver. If we want to use HSCIF0
> > on those pins on Koelsch and extension board must be connected to the
> > EXIO C connector, and two resistors and two capacitors should be
> > unsoldered. I thus don't think the Koeslch DT should contain pinmux data
> > for the HSCIF0 device. If an extension board is used and HSCIF0 needed,
> > then the DT file for the extension board should define pinmuxing for the
> > serial port.
> 
> If you would like me to revert this patch I am happy to consider doing so.

That's one option, but I'd like to get feedback on my point of view before 
reverting it. Who knows, I might be wrong ;-)

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart