[PATCH v7 1/4] arm: add ARMv7 HYP API to flush VM TLBs without address param
Christoffer Dall
christoffer.dall at linaro.org
Mon Jun 9 10:49:01 PDT 2014
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 10:06:29AM -0700, Mario Smarduch wrote:
> On 06/08/2014 05:05 AM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 04:19:24PM -0700, Mario Smarduch wrote:
> >> Patch adds HYP interface for global VM TLB invalidation without address
> >> parameter. Added ARM version of kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(), made the generic
> >> implementation a weak symbol.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Mario Smarduch <m.smarduch at samsung.com>
> >> ---
> >> arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_asm.h | 1 +
> >> arch/arm/kvm/interrupts.S | 11 +++++++++++
> >> arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> >> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 2 +-
> >> 4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_asm.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
> >> index 53b3c4a..21bc519 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
> >> @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ extern char __kvm_hyp_code_end[];
> >>
> >> extern void __kvm_flush_vm_context(void);
> >> extern void __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t ipa);
> >> +extern void __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid(struct kvm *kvm);
> >>
> >> extern int __kvm_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> >> #endif
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/interrupts.S b/arch/arm/kvm/interrupts.S
> >> index 0d68d40..bddc66b 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/interrupts.S
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/interrupts.S
> >> @@ -66,6 +66,17 @@ ENTRY(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa)
> >> bx lr
> >> ENDPROC(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa)
> >>
> >> +/**
> >> + * void __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid(struct kvm *kvm) - Flush per-VMID TLBs
> >> + *
> >> + * Reuses __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa() for ARMv7, without passing address
> >> + * parameter
> >> + */
> >> +
> >> +ENTRY(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid)
> >> + b __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa
> >> +ENDPROC(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid)
> >> +
> >> /********************************************************************
> >> * Flush TLBs and instruction caches of all CPUs inside the inner-shareable
> >> * domain, for all VMIDs
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
> >> index 2ac9588..ef29540 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
> >> @@ -56,6 +56,20 @@ static void kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t ipa)
> >> kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa, kvm, ipa);
> >> }
> >>
> >> +/**
> >> + * kvm_flush_remote_tlbs() - flush all VM TLB entries
> >> + * @kvm: pointer to kvm structure.
> >> + *
> >> + * Interface to HYP function to flush all VM TLB entries without address
> >> + * parameter. In HYP mode reuses __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa() function used by
> >> + * kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa().
> >> + */
> >> +void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm)
> >> +{
> >> + if (kvm)
> >> + kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid, kvm);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> static int mmu_topup_memory_cache(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache,
> >> int min, int max)
> >> {
> >> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> >> index fa70c6e..ba25765 100644
> >> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> >> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> >> @@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ static bool make_all_cpus_request(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int req)
> >> return called;
> >> }
> >>
> >> -void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm)
> >> +void __weak kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm)
> >> {
> >> long dirty_count = kvm->tlbs_dirty;
> >>
> >> --
> >> 1.7.9.5
> >>
> >
> > This doesn't build or link on aarch64 :(
> >
> > -Christoffer
> >
>
> I'll recompile and retest the dirty page logging portion on ARMv8 and
> resolve these issues, early next week.
>
> In the meantime if it's ok with you, I'' move forward with the
> rest of the patches on ARMv7 to get through critical issues.
>
> Would that work?
Your patches need to at least compile with other architectures, I
suggest fixing that up front. You also eventually need to somehow test
(or ask maintainers to test) a branch with your patches on the
architectures that your code messes with. This later point can be
addressed once we're close to a consensus on ARM.
-Christoffer
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list