[PATCH] mtd: atmel_nand: make ecc parameters same as definition
Josh Wu
josh.wu at atmel.com
Mon Jun 9 03:30:38 PDT 2014
Hi, Bo
Thanks for the patch.
On 6/6/2014 4:02 PM, Bo Shen wrote:
> If the ecc parameter is not the same as definition, when the
> mtd core check these parameters, it will give the unexpected
> result.
Could you be more specific to tell what kind of result will happened?
Best Regards,
Josh Wu
>
> Signed-off-by: Bo Shen <voice.shen at atmel.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
> index 4ce181a..4f5348f 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
> @@ -861,12 +861,11 @@ static int pmecc_correction(struct mtd_info *mtd, u32 pmecc_stat, uint8_t *buf,
> {
> struct nand_chip *nand_chip = mtd->priv;
> struct atmel_nand_host *host = nand_chip->priv;
> - int i, err_nbr, eccbytes;
> + int i, err_nbr;
> uint8_t *buf_pos;
> int total_err = 0;
>
> - eccbytes = nand_chip->ecc.bytes;
> - for (i = 0; i < eccbytes; i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < nand_chip->ecc.total; i++)
> if (ecc[i] != 0xff)
> goto normal_check;
> /* Erased page, return OK */
> @@ -928,7 +927,7 @@ static int atmel_nand_pmecc_read_page(struct mtd_info *mtd,
> struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf, int oob_required, int page)
> {
> struct atmel_nand_host *host = chip->priv;
> - int eccsize = chip->ecc.size;
> + int eccsize = chip->ecc.size * chip->ecc.steps;
> uint8_t *oob = chip->oob_poi;
> uint32_t *eccpos = chip->ecc.layout->eccpos;
> uint32_t stat;
> @@ -1169,8 +1168,7 @@ static int atmel_pmecc_nand_init_params(struct platform_device *pdev,
> goto err;
> }
>
> - /* ECC is calculated for the whole page (1 step) */
> - nand_chip->ecc.size = mtd->writesize;
> + nand_chip->ecc.size = sector_size;
>
> /* set ECC page size and oob layout */
> switch (mtd->writesize) {
> @@ -1185,18 +1183,20 @@ static int atmel_pmecc_nand_init_params(struct platform_device *pdev,
> host->pmecc_index_of = host->pmecc_rom_base +
> host->pmecc_lookup_table_offset;
>
> - nand_chip->ecc.steps = 1;
> + nand_chip->ecc.steps = host->pmecc_sector_number;
> nand_chip->ecc.strength = cap;
> - nand_chip->ecc.bytes = host->pmecc_bytes_per_sector *
> + nand_chip->ecc.bytes = host->pmecc_bytes_per_sector;
> + nand_chip->ecc.total = host->pmecc_bytes_per_sector *
> host->pmecc_sector_number;
> - if (nand_chip->ecc.bytes > mtd->oobsize - 2) {
> + if (nand_chip->ecc.total > mtd->oobsize - 2) {
> dev_err(host->dev, "No room for ECC bytes\n");
> err_no = -EINVAL;
> goto err;
> }
> pmecc_config_ecc_layout(&atmel_pmecc_oobinfo,
> mtd->oobsize,
> - nand_chip->ecc.bytes);
> + nand_chip->ecc.total);
> +
> nand_chip->ecc.layout = &atmel_pmecc_oobinfo;
> break;
> case 512:
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list