[RESEND PATCH v7 3/4] arm: dirty log write protect management support
Xiao Guangrong
xiaoguangrong at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Thu Jun 5 22:52:33 PDT 2014
On 06/06/2014 03:09 AM, Mario Smarduch wrote:
> On 06/04/2014 11:55 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> On 06/05/2014 05:11 AM, Mario Smarduch wrote:
>>
>>> + spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>>> +
>>> + for (i = 0; i < n / sizeof(long); i++) {
>>> + unsigned long mask;
>>> + gfn_t offset;
>>> +
>>> + if (!dirty_bitmap[i])
>>> + continue;
>>> +
>>> + is_dirty = true;
>>> +
>>> + mask = xchg(&dirty_bitmap[i], 0);
>>> + dirty_bitmap_buffer[i] = mask;
>>> +
>>> + offset = i * BITS_PER_LONG;
>>> + kvm_mmu_write_protect_pt_masked(kvm, memslot, offset, mask);
>>> + }
>>> + if (is_dirty)
>>> + kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
>>
>> You moved the flush into mmu-lock. Please do not :).
>>
>> See commit 198c74f43f0f5473f99967aead30ddc622804bc1
>>
>
> Thanks for reviewing, I revised to pick up your version.
>
> Functionally there should be no impact on ARM, the
> TLB flush function is different.
Yeah, i agree your point on ARM, but your patch moved
the function from x86 to the common code, that means
this function is reused between ARM and x86. No?
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list