[PATCHv2 1/4] arm64: Add CONFIG_DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX support
Will Deacon
will.deacon at arm.com
Tue Jun 3 08:22:01 PDT 2014
Hi Laura,
This is looking better, but comments inline.
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 09:57:35PM +0100, Laura Abbott wrote:
>
> In a similar fashion to other architecture, add the infrastructure
> and Kconfig to enable DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX support. When
> enabled, module ranges will be marked read-only/no-execute as
> appropriate.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <lauraa at codeaurora.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug | 11 ++++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/cacheflush.h | 4 ++
> arch/arm64/mm/Makefile | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c
[...]
> obj-$(CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE) += hugetlbpage.o
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c b/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..d8ab747
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2014, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 and
> + * only version 2 as published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> + */
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/mm.h>
> +#include <linux/sched.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/pgtable.h>
> +#include <asm/tlbflush.h>
> +
> +static pte_t clear_pte_bit(pte_t pte, pgprot_t prot)
> +{
> + pte_val(pte) &= ~pgprot_val(prot);
> + return pte;
> +}
> +
> +static pte_t set_pte_bit(pte_t pte, pgprot_t prot)
> +{
> + pte_val(pte) |= pgprot_val(prot);
> + return pte;
> +}
We could actually re-use these for building our pte_mk* functions in
pgtable.h. Care to move them there?
> +static int __change_memory(pte_t *ptep, pgtable_t token, unsigned long addr,
> + pgprot_t prot, bool set)
> +{
> + pte_t pte;
> +
> + if (set)
> + pte = set_pte_bit(*ptep, prot);
> + else
> + pte = clear_pte_bit(*ptep, prot);
> + set_pte(ptep, pte);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int set_page_range(pte_t *ptep, pgtable_t token, unsigned long addr,
> + void *data)
> +{
> + pgprot_t prot = (pgprot_t)data;
> +
> + return __change_memory(ptep, token, addr, prot, true);
> +}
> +
> +static int clear_page_range(pte_t *ptep, pgtable_t token, unsigned long addr,
> + void *data)
> +{
> + pgprot_t prot = (pgprot_t)data;
> +
> + return __change_memory(ptep, token, addr, prot, false);
> +}
> +
> +static int change_memory_common(unsigned long addr, int numpages,
> + pgprot_t prot, bool set)
> +{
> + unsigned long start = addr;
> + unsigned long size = PAGE_SIZE*numpages;
> + unsigned long end = start + size;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (start < MODULES_VADDR || start >= MODULES_END)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (end < MODULES_VADDR || end >= MODULES_END)
> + return -EINVAL;
Can you use is_module_address here, or do you need to change the page
attributes for areas where no modules are currently loaded too?
> + if (set)
> + ret = apply_to_page_range(&init_mm, start, size,
> + set_page_range, (void *)prot);
> + else
> + ret = apply_to_page_range(&init_mm, start, size,
> + clear_page_range, (void *)prot);
> +
> + flush_tlb_kernel_range(start, end);
> + isb();
> + return ret;
We already have an isb in flush_tlb_kernel_range.
> +static int change_memory_set_bit(unsigned long addr, int numpages,
> + pgprot_t prot)
> +{
> + return change_memory_common(addr, numpages, prot, true);
> +}
> +
> +static int change_memory_clear_bit(unsigned long addr, int numpages,
> + pgprot_t prot)
> +{
> + return change_memory_common(addr, numpages, prot, false);
> +}
> +
> +int set_memory_ro(unsigned long addr, int numpages)
> +{
> + return change_memory_set_bit(addr, numpages, __pgprot(PTE_RDONLY));
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(set_memory_ro);
> +
> +int set_memory_rw(unsigned long addr, int numpages)
> +{
> + return change_memory_clear_bit(addr, numpages, __pgprot(PTE_RDONLY));
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(set_memory_rw);
I'm slightly worried about the interaction with this and PTE_WRITE (see
linux-next). If the kernel pages are marked as PTE_DIRTY | PTE_WRITE, then
setting read-only is a weird contradiction. Can you take PTE_WRITE into
account for these two please?
Will
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list