[PATCH 1/5] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: add f_max field to private data

[Shawn Guo]

On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 02:33:00PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> The driver filled in the clk and clock fields in struct
> sdhci_pltfm_host, but they are unused in the sdhci-pltfm
> code and only ever used it for internal use. This adds
> a field f_max to private data and uses it instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer at pengutronix.de>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 18 +++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> index b841bb7..d530820 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> @@ -152,6 +152,7 @@ struct pltfm_imx_data {
>  	struct pinctrl_state *pins_200mhz;
>  	const struct esdhc_soc_data *socdata;
>  	struct esdhc_platform_data boarddata;
> +	unsigned long f_max;
>  	struct clk *clk_ipg;
>  	struct clk *clk_ahb;
>  	struct clk *clk_per;
> @@ -574,19 +575,16 @@ static unsigned int esdhc_pltfm_get_max_clock(struct sdhci_host *host)
>  {
>  	struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
>  	struct pltfm_imx_data *imx_data = pltfm_host->priv;
> -	struct esdhc_platform_data *boarddata = &imx_data->boarddata;
>  
> -	if (boarddata->f_max && (boarddata->f_max < pltfm_host->clock))
> -		return boarddata->f_max;
> -	else
> -		return pltfm_host->clock;
> +	return imx_data->f_max;
>  }
>  
>  static unsigned int esdhc_pltfm_get_min_clock(struct sdhci_host *host)
>  {
>  	struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> +	struct pltfm_imx_data *imx_data = pltfm_host->priv;
>  
> -	return pltfm_host->clock / 256 / 16;
> +	return imx_data->f_max / 256 / 16;
>  }
>  
>  static inline void esdhc_pltfm_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host,
> @@ -594,7 +592,7 @@ static inline void esdhc_pltfm_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host,
>  {
>  	struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
>  	struct pltfm_imx_data *imx_data = pltfm_host->priv;
> -	unsigned int host_clock = pltfm_host->clock;
> +	unsigned int host_clock = clk_get_rate(imx_data->clk_per);

Will this bring the issue that commit a974862faee1 (mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx:
fix access hardirq-unsafe lock in atomic context) fixed back to us?

Shawn

>  	int pre_div = 2;
>  	int div = 1;
>  	u32 temp, val;
> @@ -994,8 +992,6 @@ static int sdhci_esdhc_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		goto free_sdhci;
>  	}
>  
> -	pltfm_host->clk = imx_data->clk_per;
> -	pltfm_host->clock = clk_get_rate(pltfm_host->clk);
>  	clk_prepare_enable(imx_data->clk_per);
>  	clk_prepare_enable(imx_data->clk_ipg);
>  	clk_prepare_enable(imx_data->clk_ahb);
> @@ -1051,6 +1047,10 @@ static int sdhci_esdhc_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  					host->mmc->parent->platform_data);
>  	}
>  
> +	imx_data->f_max = clk_get_rate(imx_data->clk_per);
> +	if (boarddata->f_max && boarddata->f_max < imx_data->f_max)
> +		imx_data->f_max = boarddata->f_max;
> +
>  	/* write_protect */
>  	if (boarddata->wp_type == ESDHC_WP_GPIO) {
>  		err = mmc_gpio_request_ro(host->mmc, boarddata->wp_gpio);
> -- 
> 2.0.0.rc0
>