[PATCH v3] Documentation: devicetree: Fix tps65090 typos in example

[Javier Martinez Canillas]

Hello Andreas,

On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Andreas Färber <afaerber at suse.de> wrote:
> Specification and existing device trees use vsys-l{1,2}-supply,
> not vsys_l{1,2}-supply. Fix the example to match the specification.
>
> Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders at chromium.org>
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>
> Fixes: 21d2202158e9 ("mfd: tps65090: add DT support for tps65090")
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber at suse.de>
> ---
>  v2 -> v3:
>  * Added Fixes header
>  * + regulator and mfd maintainers
>
>  v1 -> v2:
>  * More verbose commit message (requested by Mark Rutland)
>
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt
> index 340980239ea9..ca69f5e3040c 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt
> @@ -45,8 +45,8 @@ Example:
>                 infet5-supply = <&some_reg>;
>                 infet6-supply = <&some_reg>;
>                 infet7-supply = <&some_reg>;
> -               vsys_l1-supply = <&some_reg>;
> -               vsys_l2-supply = <&some_reg>;
> +               vsys-l1-supply = <&some_reg>;
> +               vsys-l2-supply = <&some_reg>;
>

True, these also matches the .supply_name used when registering the
LDO[1-2] regulators in the tps65090 driver. So clearly the example was
wrong while the property specification is correct.

Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez at collabora.co.uk>

Best regards,
Javier