[PATCH] arm64: dmi: Add SMBIOS/DMI support
ard.biesheuvel at linaro.org
Thu Jul 31 11:44:31 PDT 2014
On 31 July 2014 18:15, Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm at linaro.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 04:53:38PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
>> > >> The patch works well on FVP model, and here are the boot log and
>> > >> dmidecode+lshw result:
>> > >>
>> > > Thanks Yi!
>> > >
>> > > Can we help Will out if he wants to test this himself?
>> > @Will: which platform do you have on hand? I am using FVP model
>> > for testing.
>> > First, you need to merge SMBIOS support into UEFI.
>> > Then, compile and install the dmidecode(open source) on the linux
>> > ,and run it.
>> I've got some stuff from Leif for testing this, but what I'm really after is
>> something that would have spotted this problem. Are there any compliance
>> tests, for example?
> The patch as previously submitted (and accepted) was functional on all
> platforms it has been tested on. It is technically not compliant with
> the UEFI specification, but it works with the images we had.
> The worst-case failure would have been the lookup function returning
> NULL and the SMBIOS tables being unavailable even though they existed.
Indeed. It would be bad for us to rely on non-compliant but wide
spread behavior, so I think it is a good thing to shake out these bugs
now, even if they haven't caused any problems.
> What you are asking for would be a test for UEFI, not for the kernel.
> (And this one might be useful to add to the fwts if it's not already
> part of it.)
Yes, it would be good if we could test for patterns like this, (i.e.,
config tables with EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME set).
More information about the linux-arm-kernel