[PATCH] ARM64: KVM: Nuke EL2 mode tlbs before enabling MMU for EL2
Marc Zyngier
marc.zyngier at arm.com
Wed Jul 30 05:30:29 PDT 2014
On Wed, Jul 30 2014 at 12:13:19 pm BST, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar <pranavkumar at linaro.org> wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> On 30 July 2014 16:30, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier at arm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Pranav,
>
> On Wed, Jul 30 2014 at 10:46:47 am BST, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar <
> pranavkumar at linaro.org> wrote:
> > X-Gene u-boot runs in EL2 mode with MMU enabled hence we might
> > have stale EL2 tlb enteris when we enable EL2 MMU on each host CPU.
> >
> > This can happen on any ARM64 board running bootloader in EL2
> > with MMU enabled.
> >
> > This patch ensures that we flush all EL2 TLBs on each host CPU
> > before enabling EL2 MMU. This is very similar to what we do
> > for EL1 TLBs before enabling EL1 MMU.
> > (Refer __cpu_setup() of arch/arm64/mm/proc.S)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar <pranavkumar at linaro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel at linaro.org>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/kvm/hyp-init.S | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp-init.S b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp-init.S
> > index d968796..c319116 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp-init.S
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp-init.S
> > @@ -80,6 +80,10 @@ __do_hyp_init:
> > msr mair_el2, x4
> > isb
> >
> > + /* Invalidate the stale TLBs from Bootloader */
> > + tlbi alle2
> > + dsb sy
> > +
> > mrs x4, sctlr_el2
> > and x4, x4, #SCTLR_EL2_EE // preserve endianness of EL2
> > ldr x5, =SCTLR_EL2_FLAGS
>
> This looks like a valid fix. But I wonder if it wouldn't be better
> located in kernel/head.S::el2_setup?
>
> Sure, I can try this on one of my flaky setup where I see this issue :)
> One question is , if someone tries to do load/unload KVM module frequently
> then do "__do_hyp_init" will require the flushing again ?
Well, we can't really "unload" KVM, it is not a module. But CPU hotplug
could trigger something similar (though I'd expect it to come back
through el2_setup anyway).
Anyway, we can probably keep it in KVM, and revisit that later if that
makes sense.
>
>
> Also, the 32bit code seems to suffer from the same issue. Care to fix it
> as well?
>
> I am fine with this but as I do not have arm32 board to test it
> somebody will need to add tested-by.
Sure. Fire away!
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list