[PATCH] arm64: Fix UP build warning in gic-v3
Marc Zyngier
marc.zyngier at arm.com
Tue Jul 29 04:57:16 PDT 2014
On Mon, Jul 28 2014 at 11:55:59 pm BST, Geoff Levand <geoff at infradead.org> wrote:
> The static routines gic_write_sgi1r() and gic_peek_irq() are only used for SMP
> builds, so move those two routines to within the defined(CONFIG_SMP)
> preprocessor conditional.
>
> Fixes build warnings like these when CONFIG_SMP=n:
>
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c: warning: ‘gic_write_sgi1r’ defined but not used
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c: warning: ‘gic_peek_irq’ defined but not used
>
> Signed-off-by: Geoff Levand <geoff at infradead.org>
> ---
> Hi Marc,
>
> I'm not sure if this has gone upstream yet, but I get these warnings
> with Catalin's current arm64/for-next/core branch.
>
> Feel free to just fold this into your gic-v3 patch if you'll be
> sending out a new version.
Hi Geof,
There is a similar patch from Mark Brown on its way (not addressing
gic_write_sgi1r though).
Thanks,
M.
>
> -Geoff
>
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
> index 57eaa5a..e9ee18a 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
> @@ -129,11 +129,6 @@ static void gic_write_grpen1(u64 val)
> isb();
> }
>
> -static void gic_write_sgi1r(u64 val)
> -{
> - asm volatile("msr_s " __stringify(ICC_SGI1R_EL1) ", %0" : : "r" (val));
> -}
> -
> static void gic_enable_sre(void)
> {
> u64 val;
> @@ -200,19 +195,6 @@ static void gic_poke_irq(struct irq_data *d, u32 offset)
> rwp_wait();
> }
>
> -static int gic_peek_irq(struct irq_data *d, u32 offset)
> -{
> - u32 mask = 1 << (gic_irq(d) % 32);
> - void __iomem *base;
> -
> - if (gic_irq_in_rdist(d))
> - base = gic_data_rdist_sgi_base();
> - else
> - base = gic_data.dist_base;
> -
> - return !!(readl_relaxed(base + offset + (gic_irq(d) / 32) * 4) & mask);
> -}
> -
> static void gic_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> {
> gic_poke_irq(d, GICD_ICENABLER);
> @@ -401,6 +383,24 @@ static void gic_cpu_init(void)
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +static void gic_write_sgi1r(u64 val)
> +{
> + asm volatile("msr_s " __stringify(ICC_SGI1R_EL1) ", %0" : : "r" (val));
> +}
> +
> +static int gic_peek_irq(struct irq_data *d, u32 offset)
> +{
> + u32 mask = 1 << (gic_irq(d) % 32);
> + void __iomem *base;
> +
> + if (gic_irq_in_rdist(d))
> + base = gic_data_rdist_sgi_base();
> + else
> + base = gic_data.dist_base;
> +
> + return !!(readl_relaxed(base + offset + (gic_irq(d) / 32) * 4) & mask);
> +}
> +
> static int gic_secondary_init(struct notifier_block *nfb,
> unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
> {
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list