[PATCH v10 2/2] dmaengine: sun6i: Add driver for the Allwinner A31 DMA controller
Mark Brown
broonie at kernel.org
Sun Jul 27 11:49:42 PDT 2014
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 01:48:52PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 08:21:19AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > It feels a little fragile to rely on the organisation of the clock tree
> > > and the naming thereof. If the IP block is ever reused on an SoC with a
> > > different clock tree layout then we have to handle things differently.
> >
> > What do you suggest then?
>
> I will admit that I don't have a better suggestion.
>
> Without knowing which particular constraint on the mux parent clock we
> care about it's difficult to suggest anything useful.
There's supposed to be facilities appearing in the generic clock code
for specifying default clock tree configurations via the DT - it's quite
a common requirement after all. It sounds like that should be able to
do the job here. Not sure if these have gone in yet or not but there's
quite a bit of demand.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140727/4cb178f7/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list