[PATCH] cpufreq: Don't destroy/realloc policy/sysfs on hotplug/suspend

Saravana Kannan skannan at codeaurora.org
Wed Jul 23 20:02:15 PDT 2014


On 07/16/2014 03:02 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 09, 2014 07:37:30 PM Saravana Kannan wrote:
>> Preliminary patch. Not tested. Just sending out to give an idea of what I'm
>> looking to do. Expect a lot more simplification when it's done.
>>
>> Benefits:
>> * A lot more simpler code.
>> * Less stability issues.
>> * Suspend/resume time would improve.
>> * Hotplug time would improve.
>> * Sysfs file permissions would be maintained.
>> * More policy settings would be maintained across suspend/resume.
>> * cpufreq stats would be maintained across hotplug for all CPUs.
>
> One problem.  The real hotplug (when the CPU actually goes away) depends on
> offline removing all that stuff for it.  How are you going to address that?
>

Ok, I think I've figured this out. But one question. Is it possible to 
physically remove one CPU in a bunch of "related cpus" without also 
unplugging the rest? Put another way, can you unplug one core from a 
cluster?

It's not too hard to support that too, but if it's not a realistic case, 
I would rather not write code for that.

-Saravana

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list