[PATCH v8 00/13] Add Maxim 77802 PMIC support

[Javier Martinez Canillas]

On 07/22/2014 02:10 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 02:44:07PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> On 07/14/2014 01:35 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> 
>> Mark, Mike and Alessandro,
> 
>> This is a gentle reminder to look at the patches that touches your subsystems
>> and provide acks if possible so Lee can merge the remainder set through the mfd
>> tree.
> 
> Please stop nagging, you are chasing after only one week which is
> excessive for something that isn't an urgent bugfix (especially
> with a series like this that has had many rapid repins).  Several weeks
> to a month would be more appropriate, and then resending the patches
> rather than sending contentless pings is more useful.  Sending mails
> like this just means that people have more mail to read that isn't your
> patch, it is more likely to get you negative attention than positive -
> for example, I will tend to deprioritise things where I'm being chased
> too urgently as I do not wish to encourage such behaviour by being seen
> to reward it.
> 

I didn't mean to bother you. It's true that it has been only a week since I
posted v8 of this series but I didn't have feedback for the clock, rtc and
regulator drivers since v5 which was posted on June, 26 so I thought that a ping
just to be sure it was not forgotten was not that bad. But sorry I won't do it
again and will just wait.

About the many re-spins, as most mfd drivers this PMIC support touches different
subsystems and the series had many patches so each time I had feedback for some
patches I prepared a new version and reposted the whole series. This doesn't
mean that all the patches changed from version to version though, some patches
have not changed for several revisions.

> In general I would recommend taking a step back, slowing down, and if
> you are not getting a response either thinking of something else to do
> in parallel or trying to do things that make it easier to accept your
> change if there are any (sometimes it's just a case of waiting).  Look
> at how frequently the relevant maintainers tend to respond, at what the
> previous review comments have been and also consider the possibility
> that people might take holidays or just be busy.
> 

Sorry, I didn't mean to imply that you are not busy or might be on holidays. I
guess I just got anxious due the merge window being close...

Best regards,
Javier