[GIT PULL 2/3] ARM: tegra: move fuse code out of arch/arm

[Olof Johansson]

On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren at wwwdotorg.org> wrote:
> On 07/08/2014 07:43 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 02:44:17AM +0200, Olof Johansson wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 03:23:45PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>>> This branch moves code related to the Tegra fuses out of arch/arm and
>>>> into a centralized location which could be shared with ARM64. It also
>>>> adds support for reading the fuse data through sysfs.
>>>
>>> The new/moved misc driver isn't acked by any misc maintainer, so I can't
>>> take this branch.
>>>
>>> I saw no indication from searching the mailing list of that either,
>>> so it wasn't just a missed acked-by.
>>>
>>> I wonder if this code should go under drivers/soc/ instead?
>>
>> It's modelled after sunxi_sid.c which lives in drivers/misc/eeprom/.
>> Originally this driver was also in drivers/misc/eeprom/, but Stephen objected
>> and therefore it was moved to drivers/misc/fuse. I think that's the right
>> place still. We anyway need this driver for sata and xhci.
>
> Sigh. This is exactly why (a) I suggested during that thread that the
> driver should be in drivers/soc not drivers/misc and (b) I sent the pull
> requests early enough so I could deal with any objections before my
> vacation:-( I wish people would just respond to my review comments by
> implementing them rather than persuading me to do the wrong thing. Since
> this is all a dependency for pretty much everything for Tegra for 3.17,
> I guess we should just drop all the Tegra pull requests for 3.17 and
> we'll have to redo all the patches for 3.18:-( But if Thierry can (or
> already has in another thread I haven't seen while on vacation) sort
> this out be redoing all the Tegra branches, that might be fine too.

Thierry has been following up on it, I don't think we're too late for 3.17 yet.


-Olof