[PATCH v2] i2c: efm32: correct namespacing of location property

[Uwe Kleine-König]

On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 03:40:00PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:50:14AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > Olof Johansson pointed out that usually the company name is picked as
> > namespace prefix to specific properties. So expect "energymicro,location"
> > but fall back to the previously introduced name "efm32,location".
> > 
> > Cc: Olof Johansson <olof at lixom.net>
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de>
> 
> Applied to for-next, thanks! If you think this is better suited in
> for-current, let me know.
I'm not in a hurry. If you take it it's fine for me.

(BTW, I'm not sure i fI understand your branch naming. for-next means
"targeting the next merge window" and for-current means "targeting the
next release"? So for-next currently means 3.17-rc1?)

Thanks
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |