[PATCH 0/4 V3] irqchip: gic: Introduce ARM GICv2m MSI(-X) support
Jason Cooper
jason at lakedaemon.net
Thu Jul 17 05:51:31 PDT 2014
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:59:57AM -0500, Suravee Suthikulanit wrote:
> On 7/13/2014 6:14 PM, Jason Cooper wrote:
> >Suravee,
> >
> >On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 06:05:00PM -0500, suravee.suthikulpanit at amd.com wrote:
> >>From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit at amd.com>
> >>
> >>This patch set introduces support for MSI(-X) in GICv2m specification,
> >>which is implemented in some variation of GIC400.
> >>
> >>This depends on and has been tested with the V7 of"Add support for PCI in AArch64"
> >>(https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/14/320).
> >
> >Grrr. I mis-spoke against your v1 of this series. There are more
> >changes to irq-gic.c than I originally thought in this series.
>
> I am not quite sure what your are referring to.
>
No problem, it was an old comment. If you weren't depending on it then it
doesn't matter. ;-)
> >Additionally, we have a lot of other significant changes to that driver
> >as well this cycle. It would be really helpful if I could take patches
> >1-3 through irqchip/gic. I can Ack #4 with the Subject change, and the
> >branch it lands in can depend on irqchip/gic, no problem there.
>
> Patch 1-3 should be able to go through the irqchip/gic along with
> the gicv3 from Marc, which I have rebased this patch against.
Perfect!
> Patch 4 is arch64 architectural changes. Therefore, it might need
> to be going through a different branch. Marc/Mark/Will/Catalin, do
> you have any suggestions on which branch this should go to?
Yep, I'll Ack it for arm64 to take, conflicts should be minimal.
thx,
Jason.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list