[PATCH 2/8] mmc: sdhci: host: add new f_sdh30
Vincent.Yang
Vincent.Yang at tw.fujitsu.com
Wed Jul 16 04:07:49 PDT 2014
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Arnd Bergmann [mailto:arnd at arndb.de]
>On Wednesday 16 July 2014 17:35:41 Vincent. Yang wrote:
>
>> >
>> >> +unsigned int sdhci_f_sdh30_get_min_clock(struct sdhci_host *host)
>> >> +{
>> >> + return F_SDH30_MIN_CLOCK;
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +void sdhci_f_sdh30_reset(struct sdhci_host *host, u8 mask)
>> >> +{
>> >> + struct f_sdhost_priv *priv = sdhci_priv(host);
>> >> +
>> >> + if (gpio_is_valid(priv->gpio_select_1v8))
>> >> + gpio_direction_output(priv->gpio_select_1v8, 1);
>> >> +
>> >> + if (sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL) == 0) {
>> >> + sdhci_writew(host, 0xBC01, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);
>> >> + mmiowb();
>> >> + }
>> >
>> >Can you explain the mmiowb call here?
>>
>> This came from the original 3.0 based driver. It's trying to be a
>> write memory barrier. It wants to ensure the clock control change
>> actually happened before the following code.
>> I'll change it to a regular wmb in next version.
>
>Note that with 'readw'/writew', you shouldn't need any extra barriers.
>If sdhci_writew() is readw_relaxed(), wmb() is the correct barrier.
Hi Arnd,
The sdhci_writew() is using writew(), so I shouldn't need any extra
barriers. I'll remove them in next version.
Thanks a lot for your review!
Best regards,
Vincent Yang
>
>> >> +
>> >> + if (!of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "bus-width",
>&bus_width))
>> >{
>> >> + switch (bus_width) {
>> >> + case 8:
>> >> + dev_info(dev, "Applying 8 bit bus width\n");
>> >> + host->mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA;
>> >> + break;
>> >> + case 4:
>> >> + dev_info(dev, "Applying 4 bit bus width\n");
>> >> + host->mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA;
>> >> + break;
>> >> + case 1:
>> >> + default:
>> >> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid bus width: %u\n", bus_width);
>> >> + break;
>> >> + }
>> >> + }
>> >
>> >This should probably be done in generic sdhci code somewhere. How about
>> >adding it to sdhci_get_of_property instead_
>>
>> I should use generic mmc_of_parse for it. I'll update it in next version.
>
>Ah right, I thought we had this in common code already but couldn't find
>it. Using mmc_of_parse() is definitely the correct solution here.
>
>> >> + priv->clk_sd4 = clk_get(&pdev->dev, "sd_sd4clk");
>> >> + if (!IS_ERR(priv->clk_sd4)) {
>> >> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(priv->clk_sd4);
>> >> + if (ret < 0) {
>> >> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to enable sd4 clock: %d\n", ret);
>> >> + goto err_clk1;
>> >> + }
>> >> + }
>> >> + priv->clk_b = clk_get(&pdev->dev, "sd_bclk");
>> >> + if (!IS_ERR(priv->clk_b)) {
>> >> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(priv->clk_b);
>> >> + if (ret < 0) {
>> >> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to enable clk_b clock: %d\n", ret);
>> >> + goto err_clk2;
>> >> + }
>> >> + }
>> >
>> >Please pick clock names that match what some of the other drivers use.
>>
>> I'll use "iface" and "core" for clock names because they match what used
>> in sdhci-msm driver.
>
>Ok, makes sense.
>
> Arnd
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list