[PATCHv2 06/10] ARM: DRA7: hwmod_data: Add mailbox hwmod data

Tony Lindgren tony at atomide.com
Wed Jul 16 00:07:09 PDT 2014


* Suman Anna <s-anna at ti.com> [140715 09:59]:
> Hi Tony,
> 
> On 07/15/2014 08:30 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Suman Anna <s-anna at ti.com> [140711 14:47]:
> >> Add the hwmod data for the 13 instances of the system mailbox
> >> IP in DRA7 SoC. The patch is needed for performing a soft-reset
> >> while configuring the respective mailbox instance, otherwise is
> >> a non-essential change for functionality. The modules are smart
> >> idled on reset, and the IP module mode is hardware controlled.
> >>
> >> Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak at ti.com>
> >> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul at pwsan.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna at ti.com>
> >> ---
> >>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_7xx_data.c | 305 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  1 file changed, 305 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_7xx_data.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_7xx_data.c
> >> index 20b4398..e35f5b1 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_7xx_data.c
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_7xx_data.c
> >> @@ -939,6 +939,194 @@ static struct omap_hwmod dra7xx_i2c5_hwmod = {
> >>  };
> >>  
> >>  /*
> >> + * 'mailbox' class
> >> + *
> >> + */
> >> +
> >> +static struct omap_hwmod_class_sysconfig dra7xx_mailbox_sysc = {
> >> +	.rev_offs	= 0x0000,
> >> +	.sysc_offs	= 0x0010,
> >> +	.sysc_flags	= (SYSC_HAS_RESET_STATUS | SYSC_HAS_SIDLEMODE |
> >> +			   SYSC_HAS_SOFTRESET),
> >> +	.idlemodes	= (SIDLE_FORCE | SIDLE_NO | SIDLE_SMART),
> >> +	.sysc_fields	= &omap_hwmod_sysc_type2,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static struct omap_hwmod_class dra7xx_mailbox_hwmod_class = {
> >> +	.name	= "mailbox",
> >> +	.sysc	= &dra7xx_mailbox_sysc,
> >> +};
> > 
> > Hmm I'm seeing just the following MAILBOX_SYSCONFIG in at least
> > am57xx TRM:
> > 
> > 31:4	RESERVED
> > 3:2	SIDLEMODE	0 = force-idle 1 = no-idle, 2 = smart-idle, 3 = reserved
> > 1	RESERVED
> > 0	SOFTRESET
> > 
> > So it seems that SYSC_HAS_RESET_STATUS above is wrong? Can you guys
> > please check.
> 
> The same SOFTRESET bit is used for both triggering the softreset and
> reading the reset done status. Once you write a 1 to trigger a reset,
> the bit will be cleared once the reset is done. This is no different
> from OMAP4. The logic in _wait_softreset_complete in omap_hwmod.c was
> already designed to work with this properly.

Oh OK, I guess I got it confused with SYSS_HAS_RESET_STATUS. Paul,
want to ack this one if no other issues? I can then set this series
into a branch against -rc1 that we can all merge in as needed as
it seems that the driver changes may need this branch as a base too.

Regards,

Tony



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list