[RFC PATCH 2/2] irqchip: GIC: introduce method to deactive interupts

Liu Hua sdu.liu at huawei.com
Thu Jul 10 23:46:17 PDT 2014


When using kdump on ARM platform, if kernel panics in interrupt handler
(maybe PPI or SPI), the capture kernel can not recive certain interrupt,
and fails to boot.

On this situation, We have read register GICC_IAR. But we have no chance
to write relative bit to register GICC_EOIR(kernel paniced before). So
the state of this type interrupt remains active. Ant that makes gic not
deliver this type interrupt to cpu interface.

So we should not assume that all interruts state of GIC is inactive when
kernel initailize the GIC. This patch identifies this type interrupts
and deactives them;

Signed-off-by: Liu Hua <sdu.liu at huawei.com>
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
index ddee133..d8620cf 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
@@ -352,12 +352,68 @@ static u8 gic_get_cpumask(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
 	return mask;
 }
 
+void gic_v1_eois(u32 active, void __iomem *cpu_base)
+{
+	int bit = -1;
+
+	while ((bit = find_next_bit((unsigned long *) &active,
+						32, bit + 1)) < 32) {
+		writel_relaxed(bit, cpu_base + GIC_CPU_EOI);
+	}
+}
+
+void gic_v1_clear_active(void __iomem *dist_base,
+			void __iomem *cpu_base, int gic_irqs)
+{
+	int irq, offset;
+	u32 active;
+
+	for (irq = 0; irq < gic_irqs; irq += 32) {
+		offset = GIC_DIST_ACTIVE_SET + irq * 4 / 32;
+		active = readl_relaxed(dist_base + offset);
+		if (!active)
+			continue;
+		gic_v1_eois(active, cpu_base);
+	}
+}
+
+void gic_v2_clear_active(void __iomem *dist_base, int gic_irqs)
+{
+	int irq, offset;
+	u32 active;
+
+	for (irq = 0; irq < gic_irqs; irq += 32) {
+		offset = irq * 4 / 32 + GIC_DIST_ACTIVE_SET;
+		active = readl_relaxed(dist_base + offset);
+		if (!active)
+			continue;
+		offset = irq * 4 / 32 + GIC_DIST_ACTIVE_CLEAR;
+		writel_relaxed(active, dist_base + offset);
+	}
+}
+
+void __init gic_dist_clear_active(void __iomem *dist_base,
+					void __iomem *cpu_base, int gic_irqs)
+{
+	u32 ArchRev;
+
+	ArchRev = readl_relaxed(dist_base + GIC_DIST_ICPIDR2);
+	ArchRev = (ArchRev >> 4) & 0xF;
+
+	if (ArchRev == 0x1) {
+		gic_v1_clear_active(dist_base, cpu_base, gic_irqs);
+	} else {
+		gic_v2_clear_active(dist_base, gic_irqs);
+	}
+}
+
 static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
 {
 	unsigned int i;
 	u32 cpumask;
 	unsigned int gic_irqs = gic->gic_irqs;
 	void __iomem *base = gic_data_dist_base(gic);
+	void __iomem *cpu_base = gic_data_cpu_base(gic);
 
 	writel_relaxed(0, base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
 
@@ -371,6 +427,7 @@ static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
 		writel_relaxed(cpumask, base + GIC_DIST_TARGET + i * 4 / 4);
 
 	gic_dist_config(base, gic_irqs, NULL);
+	gic_dist_clear_active(base, cpu_base, gic_irqs);
 
 	writel_relaxed(1, base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
 }
-- 
1.9.0




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list