[PATCHv3 5/5] mmc: dw_mmc: replace "disable-wp" from slot's quirk to host's quirk
Ulf Hansson
ulf.hansson at linaro.org
Thu Jul 10 03:29:09 PDT 2014
On 10 July 2014 11:40, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung at samsung.com> wrote:
> Hi, Ulf.
>
> On 07/10/2014 06:15 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 10 July 2014 09:08, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung at samsung.com> wrote:
>>> Replaced the "disable-wp" into host's quirks.
>>> (Because the slot-node is removed at dt-file.)
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung at samsung.com>
>>
>> Hi Jaehoon,
>>
>> I plan to carry these patches through my mmc tree and I will share
>> them through a PR from an immutable branch with the ARM SoC guys.
>> Please tell me if you have any concern with this set up.
Hmm, I having a second thought around this. Could I just apply the mmc
patches for my next branch instead of involving ARM SoC? In other
words, are there any decencies? If not, I might just apply patch 1 and
5.
Kind regards
Uffe
>>
>> Now, while I was applying this patch, I found it had checkpatch
>> errors. Please run checkpatch and resend a new version.
>
> Sorry for not checking the patch. I will resend a new version.
> Thanks for pointing out.
>
> Best Regards,
> Jaehoon Chung
>
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Uffe
>>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 12 +++++-------
>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>>> index 1ac227c..a3ccd07 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>>> @@ -997,7 +997,7 @@ static int dw_mci_get_ro(struct mmc_host *mmc)
>>> int gpio_ro = mmc_gpio_get_ro(mmc);
>>>
>>> /* Use platform get_ro function, else try on board write protect */
>>> - if (slot->quirks & DW_MCI_SLOT_QUIRK_NO_WRITE_PROTECT)
>>> + if (slot->host->quirks & DW_MCI_SLOT_QUIRK_NO_WRITE_PROTECT)
>>> read_only = 0;
>>> else if (!IS_ERR_VALUE(gpio_ro))
>>> read_only = gpio_ro;
>>> @@ -2006,12 +2006,7 @@ static struct device_node *dw_mci_of_find_slot_node(struct device *dev, u8 slot)
>>> static struct dw_mci_of_slot_quirks {
>>> char *quirk;
>>> int id;
>>> -} of_slot_quirks[] = {
>>> - {
>>> - .quirk = "disable-wp",
>>> - .id = DW_MCI_SLOT_QUIRK_NO_WRITE_PROTECT,
>>> - },
>>> -};
>>> +} of_slot_quirks[] = {};
>>>
>>> static int dw_mci_of_get_slot_quirks(struct device *dev, u8 slot)
>>> {
>>> @@ -2238,6 +2233,9 @@ static struct dw_mci_of_quirks {
>>> {
>>> .quirk = "broken-cd",
>>> .id = DW_MCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION,
>>> + },{
>>> + .quirk = "disable-wp",
>>> + .id = DW_MCI_SLOT_QUIRK_NO_WRITE_PROTECT,
>>> },
>>> };
>>>
>>> --
>>> 1.7.9.5
>>>
>>
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list