[PATCH] ARM: shmobile: Remove opps table check for cpufreq

Simon Horman horms at verge.net.au
Wed Jul 9 01:50:35 PDT 2014


On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 06:01:32PM +0900, Gaku Inami wrote:
> (2014/06/25 17:04), Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 25 June 2014 13:28, Gaku Inami <gaku.inami.xw at bp.renesas.com> wrote:
> >> This patch is based on feedback from Viresh Kumar.
> >> Since cpufreq-cpu0 driver has already check opp table, there is no
> >> need to same check in mach-shmobile.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Gaku Inami <gaku.inami.xw at bp.renesas.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Based on : renesas-devel-v3.16-rc2-20140623
> > I hope you have tested that this doesn't break it :)
> 
> I have already tested this patch.
> There was no problem to verify the following cases.
>   case1 : Normal case
>   case2 : Opps table is not exist
>   case3 : CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0 is disabled

Thanks, and sorry for letting this slip through the cracks.
I have queued it up.

> >>  arch/arm/mach-shmobile/cpufreq.c |   16 +---------------
> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/cpufreq.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/cpufreq.c
> >> index e2c868f..8a24b2b 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/cpufreq.c
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/cpufreq.c
> >> @@ -8,24 +8,10 @@
> >>   * for more details.
> >>   */
> >>
> >> -#include <linux/of.h>
> >> -#include <linux/of_device.h>
> >>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >>
> >>  int __init shmobile_cpufreq_init(void)
> >>  {
> >> -       struct device_node *np;
> >> -
> >> -       np = of_cpu_device_node_get(0);
> >> -       if (np == NULL) {
> >> -               pr_err("failed to find cpu0 node\n");
> >> -               return 0;
> >> -       }
> >> -
> >> -       if (of_get_property(np, "operating-points", NULL))
> >> -               platform_device_register_simple("cpufreq-cpu0", -1, NULL, 0);
> >> -
> >> -       of_node_put(np);
> >> -
> >> +       platform_device_register_simple("cpufreq-cpu0", -1, NULL, 0);
> >>         return 0;
> >>  }
> > Now that there is nothing else in this file, do you really need a separate
> > file for cpufreq?
> >
> > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar at linaro.org>
> 
> Thank you for your ack. I hope to leave this file.
> In the future, I will add a fix that depends on Renesas-SoC to this file.
> 



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list