a case for a common efuse API?

[Olof Johansson]

On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd at codeaurora.org> wrote:

> I added Tegra folks because I see that on Tegra this hardware is exposed
> via an SoC specific API, tegra_fuse_readl(), and an associated driver in
> drivers/misc/fuse/tegra/. Unfortunately I don't see any users of the API
> outside of the speedo code in the same directory and the sysfs bin
> attribute that may or may not be in use by some userspace code.

Note that I also turned down the pull request that houses the code
under drivers/misc.

This is the type of stuff we've been talking about needing a home for
somewhere, and drivers/soc was one of the ones mentioned for that. I
really don't like adding dependencies on a random driver from platform
code, for example.


-Olof