[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] xen/arm: introduce XENFEAT_grant_map_11
Julien Grall
julien.grall at linaro.org
Tue Jul 8 09:53:18 PDT 2014
Hi Ian and Stefano,
On 07/08/2014 04:59 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-07-08 at 16:54 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>> On Tue, 8 Jul 2014, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2014-07-08 at 16:42 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>>> The flag tells us that the hypervisor maps a grant page to guest
>>>> physical address == machine address of the page in addition to the
>>>> normal grant mapping address. It is needed to properly issue cache
>>>> maintenance operation at the completion of a DMA operation involving a
>>>> foreign grant.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini at eu.citrix.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c | 6 ++++++
>>>> include/xen/interface/features.h | 3 +++
>>>> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
>>>> index b96723e..ee3135a 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
>>>> @@ -262,6 +262,12 @@ static int __init xen_guest_init(void)
>>>> xen_domain_type = XEN_HVM_DOMAIN;
>>>>
>>>> xen_setup_features();
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!xen_feature(XENFEAT_grant_map_11)) {
>>>> + pr_warn("Please upgrade your Xen.\n"
>>>> + "If your platform has any non-coherent DMA devices, they won't work properly.\n");
>>>> + }
>>>
>>> Unfortunately this isn't quite complete. On a system where all devices
>>> are behind an SMMU then we would want to be able to disable the 1:1
>>> workaround, which in turn would imply disabling this feature flag too
>>> (since it is no longer necessary and also impossible to implement in
>>> that case).
>>
>> That is true, but in such a system we would have to tell the kernel that
>> DMAing is safe, so this will turn into:
>
> Oh right, yes. Good then ;-)
FWIW, I've sent a patch series a couple ago to avoid using swiotlb when
the device is protected (see https://patches.linaro.org/25070/).
I should take time to rework properly and send a new version.
Regards,
--
Julien Grall
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list