Android and compatibility with deprecated armv7 instructions
Catalin Marinas
catalin.marinas at arm.com
Mon Jul 7 07:52:08 PDT 2014
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 01:59:54PM +0000, Janne Grunau wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann <arnd <at> arndb.de> writes:
> > but I don't see how we could emulate IT without anything
> > short of a full interpretation of user instructions from the kernel.
>
> Avoiding deprecated forms of IT would be harder. It's used more often in
> libav (~50 times)
Is this explicitly written IT instructions or in generated code (gas,
gcc)?
> so it should be only disabled if it's emulated or not
> available using an explicit HWCAP. Not using Thumb for those functions would
> be another option for libav. Again this doesn't fix existing binaries and it
> doesn't fix compiled code.
As I said, I don't see this going away (easily). I've heard the
toolchain guys adding warnings but they don't help unless you rebuild
your code. Given the amount of IT instructions, I don't even propose
adding emulation/warnings to the kernel for the time being (that would
be step 1 in my "instruction deprecation" proposal, we have to think
about it; some trapping would be handy to to assess the impact but
still defaulting to native).
--
Catalin
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list