[PATCH 08/17] ARM: S5PC100: no more support S5PC100 SoC

Kukjin Kim kgene.kim at samsung.com
Tue Jul 1 05:18:07 PDT 2014


Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> 
> On Tuesday 01 July 2014 19:21:16 Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > --- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig
> > @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ config PLAT_SAMSUNG
> >
> >  config PLAT_S5P
> >         bool
> > -       depends on (ARCH_S5PC100 || ARCH_S5PV210)
> > +       depends on ARCH_S5PV210
> >         default y
> >         select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
> >         select ARM_VIC
> > @@ -78,14 +78,14 @@ config SAMSUNG_CLKSRC
> >           used by newer systems such as the S3C64XX.
> >
> >  config S5P_CLOCK
> > -       def_bool (ARCH_S5PC100 || ARCH_S5PV210)
> > +       def_bool ARCH_S5PV210
> >         help
> >           Support common clock part for ARCH_S5P and ARCH_EXYNOS SoCs
> >
> >  # options for IRQ support
> >
> >  config S5P_IRQ
> > -       def_bool (ARCH_S5PC100 || ARCH_S5PV210)
> > +       def_bool ARCH_S5PV210
> >         help
> >           Support common interrupt part for ARCH_S5P SoCs
> >
> > @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ config S3C_GPIO_TRACK
> >
> >  config S5P_DEV_UART
> >         def_bool y
> > -       depends on (ARCH_S5PC100 || ARCH_S5PV210)
> > +       depends on ARCH_S5PV210
> >
> >  # ADC driver
> >
> 
> I guess the next logical step would be to either remove these entirely
> after the move to DT-only ARCH_S5PV210 obsoletes them, or to move the
> code back to mach-s5pv210, right?
> 
Yeah both are possible, but the latter would be more possible at this moment,
I think. I will cleanup stuff in plat-samsung as you suggested :-)

> 
> >  config SAMSUNG_DMADEV
> >        bool "Use legacy Samsung DMA abstraction"
> > -       depends on CPU_S5PV210 || CPU_S5PC100 || ARCH_S3C64XX
> > +       depends on CPU_S5PV210 || ARCH_S3C64XX
> >         select DMADEVICES
> >         default y
> >        help
> 
> It would be good to just kill this one off now, as nothing uses it
> any more, but that's also a separate patch.
> 
Maybe it is still used for s5pv210 and s3c64xx? If I misunderstand your
comments, please kindly let me know.

Thanks,
Kukjin




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list