[PATCH 08/17] ARM: S5PC100: no more support S5PC100 SoC
Kukjin Kim
kgene.kim at samsung.com
Tue Jul 1 05:18:07 PDT 2014
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 01 July 2014 19:21:16 Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > --- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig
> > @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ config PLAT_SAMSUNG
> >
> > config PLAT_S5P
> > bool
> > - depends on (ARCH_S5PC100 || ARCH_S5PV210)
> > + depends on ARCH_S5PV210
> > default y
> > select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
> > select ARM_VIC
> > @@ -78,14 +78,14 @@ config SAMSUNG_CLKSRC
> > used by newer systems such as the S3C64XX.
> >
> > config S5P_CLOCK
> > - def_bool (ARCH_S5PC100 || ARCH_S5PV210)
> > + def_bool ARCH_S5PV210
> > help
> > Support common clock part for ARCH_S5P and ARCH_EXYNOS SoCs
> >
> > # options for IRQ support
> >
> > config S5P_IRQ
> > - def_bool (ARCH_S5PC100 || ARCH_S5PV210)
> > + def_bool ARCH_S5PV210
> > help
> > Support common interrupt part for ARCH_S5P SoCs
> >
> > @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ config S3C_GPIO_TRACK
> >
> > config S5P_DEV_UART
> > def_bool y
> > - depends on (ARCH_S5PC100 || ARCH_S5PV210)
> > + depends on ARCH_S5PV210
> >
> > # ADC driver
> >
>
> I guess the next logical step would be to either remove these entirely
> after the move to DT-only ARCH_S5PV210 obsoletes them, or to move the
> code back to mach-s5pv210, right?
>
Yeah both are possible, but the latter would be more possible at this moment,
I think. I will cleanup stuff in plat-samsung as you suggested :-)
>
> > config SAMSUNG_DMADEV
> > bool "Use legacy Samsung DMA abstraction"
> > - depends on CPU_S5PV210 || CPU_S5PC100 || ARCH_S3C64XX
> > + depends on CPU_S5PV210 || ARCH_S3C64XX
> > select DMADEVICES
> > default y
> > help
>
> It would be good to just kill this one off now, as nothing uses it
> any more, but that's also a separate patch.
>
Maybe it is still used for s5pv210 and s3c64xx? If I misunderstand your
comments, please kindly let me know.
Thanks,
Kukjin
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list