[PATCH 2/6] iommu/arm-smmu: Support buggy implementation where all config accesses are secure
Andreas Herrmann
andreas.herrmann at calxeda.com
Thu Jan 30 13:18:05 EST 2014
In such a case we have to use secure aliases of some non-secure
registers.
This handling is switched on by DT property
"calxeda,smmu-secure-config-access" for an SMMU node.
Cc: Andreas Herrmann <herrmann.der.user at googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann at calxeda.com>
---
drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
index 7111461..0438ec1 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
@@ -60,6 +60,15 @@
#define ARM_SMMU_GR0(smmu) ((smmu)->base)
#define ARM_SMMU_GR1(smmu) ((smmu)->base + (smmu)->pagesize)
+/*
+ * SMMU global address space with conditional offset to access secure aliases of
+ * non-secure registers (e.g. nsCR0: 0x400, nsGFSR: 0x448, nsGFSYNR0: 0x450)
+ */
+#define ARM_SMMU_GR0_NS(smmu) \
+ ((smmu)->base + \
+ ((smmu->options & ARM_SMMU_OPT_SECURE_CONFIG_ACCESS) \
+ ? 0x400 : 0))
+
/* Page table bits */
#define ARM_SMMU_PTE_PAGE (((pteval_t)3) << 0)
#define ARM_SMMU_PTE_CONT (((pteval_t)1) << 52)
@@ -350,6 +359,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_device {
u32 features;
#define ARM_SMMU_OPT_ISOLATE_DEVICES (1 << 0)
+#define ARM_SMMU_OPT_SECURE_CONFIG_ACCESS (1 << 1)
u32 options;
int version;
@@ -408,6 +418,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_option_prop {
static struct arm_smmu_option_prop arm_smmu_options [] = {
{ ARM_SMMU_OPT_ISOLATE_DEVICES, "arm,smmu-isolate-devices" },
+ { ARM_SMMU_OPT_SECURE_CONFIG_ACCESS, "calxeda,smmu-secure-config-access" },
{ 0, NULL},
};
@@ -637,16 +648,16 @@ static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_global_fault(int irq, void *dev)
{
u32 gfsr, gfsynr0, gfsynr1, gfsynr2;
struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = dev;
- void __iomem *gr0_base = ARM_SMMU_GR0(smmu);
+ void __iomem *gr0_base = ARM_SMMU_GR0_NS(smmu);
gfsr = readl_relaxed(gr0_base + ARM_SMMU_GR0_sGFSR);
- if (!gfsr)
- return IRQ_NONE;
-
gfsynr0 = readl_relaxed(gr0_base + ARM_SMMU_GR0_sGFSYNR0);
gfsynr1 = readl_relaxed(gr0_base + ARM_SMMU_GR0_sGFSYNR1);
gfsynr2 = readl_relaxed(gr0_base + ARM_SMMU_GR0_sGFSYNR2);
+ if (!gfsr)
+ return IRQ_NONE;
+
dev_err_ratelimited(smmu->dev,
"Unexpected global fault, this could be serious\n");
dev_err_ratelimited(smmu->dev,
@@ -1601,9 +1612,9 @@ static void arm_smmu_device_reset(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
int i = 0;
u32 reg;
- /* Clear Global FSR */
- reg = readl_relaxed(gr0_base + ARM_SMMU_GR0_sGFSR);
- writel(reg, gr0_base + ARM_SMMU_GR0_sGFSR);
+ /* clear global FSR */
+ reg = readl_relaxed(ARM_SMMU_GR0_NS(smmu) + ARM_SMMU_GR0_sGFSR);
+ writel(reg, ARM_SMMU_GR0_NS(smmu) + ARM_SMMU_GR0_sGFSR);
/* Mark all SMRn as invalid and all S2CRn as bypass */
for (i = 0; i < smmu->num_mapping_groups; ++i) {
@@ -1623,7 +1634,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_device_reset(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
writel_relaxed(0, gr0_base + ARM_SMMU_GR0_TLBIALLH);
writel_relaxed(0, gr0_base + ARM_SMMU_GR0_TLBIALLNSNH);
- reg = readl_relaxed(gr0_base + ARM_SMMU_GR0_sCR0);
+ reg = readl_relaxed(ARM_SMMU_GR0_NS(smmu) + ARM_SMMU_GR0_sCR0);
/* Enable fault reporting */
reg |= (sCR0_GFRE | sCR0_GFIE | sCR0_GCFGFRE | sCR0_GCFGFIE);
@@ -1642,7 +1653,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_device_reset(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
/* Push the button */
arm_smmu_tlb_sync(smmu);
- writel_relaxed(reg, gr0_base + ARM_SMMU_GR0_sCR0);
+ writel(reg, ARM_SMMU_GR0_NS(smmu) + ARM_SMMU_GR0_sCR0);
}
static int arm_smmu_id_size_to_bits(int size)
@@ -1976,7 +1987,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
free_irq(smmu->irqs[i], smmu);
/* Turn the thing off */
- writel_relaxed(sCR0_CLIENTPD, ARM_SMMU_GR0(smmu) + ARM_SMMU_GR0_sCR0);
+ writel(sCR0_CLIENTPD,ARM_SMMU_GR0_NS(smmu) + ARM_SMMU_GR0_sCR0);
return 0;
}
--
1.7.9.5
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list