[PATCH v2 06/10] ARM: KVM: fix handling of trapped 64bit coprocessor accesses

[Christoffer Dall]

On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 02:56:38PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Commit 240e99cbd00a (ARM: KVM: Fix 64-bit coprocessor handling)
> changed the way we match the 64bit coprocessor access from
> user space, but didn't update the trap handler for the same
> set of registers.
> 
> The effect is that a trapped 64bit access is never matched, leading
> to a fault being injected into the guest. This went unnoticed as we
> didn;t really trap any 64bit register so far.

didn't

> 
> Placing the CRm field of the access into the CRn field of the matching
> structure fixes the problem. Also update the debug feature to emit the
> expected string in case of failing match.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier at arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c | 4 ++--
>  arch/arm/kvm/coproc.h | 4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c b/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c
> index 78c0885..126c90d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c
> @@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ int kvm_handle_cp15_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>  {
>  	struct coproc_params params;
>  
> -	params.CRm = (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) >> 1) & 0xf;
> +	params.CRn = (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) >> 1) & 0xf;
>  	params.Rt1 = (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) >> 5) & 0xf;
>  	params.is_write = ((kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) & 1) == 0);
>  	params.is_64bit = true;
> @@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ int kvm_handle_cp15_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>  	params.Op1 = (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) >> 16) & 0xf;
>  	params.Op2 = 0;
>  	params.Rt2 = (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) >> 10) & 0xf;
> -	params.CRn = 0;
> +	params.CRm = 0;
>  
>  	return emulate_cp15(vcpu, &params);
>  }
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.h b/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.h
> index 0461d5c..c5ad7ff 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.h
> @@ -58,8 +58,8 @@ static inline void print_cp_instr(const struct coproc_params *p)
>  {
>  	/* Look, we even formatted it for you to paste into the table! */
>  	if (p->is_64bit) {
> -		kvm_pr_unimpl(" { CRm(%2lu), Op1(%2lu), is64, func_%s },\n",
> -			      p->CRm, p->Op1, p->is_write ? "write" : "read");
> +		kvm_pr_unimpl(" { CRm64(%2lu), Op1(%2lu), is64, func_%s },\n",
> +			      p->CRn, p->Op1, p->is_write ? "write" : "read");
>  	} else {
>  		kvm_pr_unimpl(" { CRn(%2lu), CRm(%2lu), Op1(%2lu), Op2(%2lu), is32,"
>  			      " func_%s },\n",
> -- 
> 1.8.3.4
> 

Thanks for fixing my broken fix!

Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall at linaro.org>