[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH RFC 4/6] net: rfkill: gpio: add device tree support
Chen-Yu Tsai
wens at csie.org
Tue Jan 28 23:01:42 EST 2014
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:24 PM, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard at free-electrons.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 02:47:29PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens at csie.org>
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/rfkill/rfkill-gpio.txt | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> net/rfkill/rfkill-gpio.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rfkill/rfkill-gpio.txt
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rfkill/rfkill-gpio.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rfkill/rfkill-gpio.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..8a07ea4
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rfkill/rfkill-gpio.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
>> +GPIO controlled RFKILL devices
>> +
>> +Required properties:
>> +- compatible : Must be "rfkill-gpio".
>> +- rfkill-name : Name of RFKILL device
>> +- rfkill-type : Type of RFKILL device: 1 for WiFi, 2 for BlueTooth
>> +- NAME_shutdown-gpios : GPIO phandle to shutdown control
>> + (phandle must be the second)
>
> Can't it be handled by a regulator?
>
>> +- NAME_reset-gpios : GPIO phandle to reset control
>
> And this one using the reset framework?
The driver is already used in platform device and ACPI fashions.
AFAIK, ACPI only passes the GPIO lines. Preferably the behavior
and requirements between the different usages remain the same.
Cheers
ChenYu
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list