[PATCH 2/9] ARM: dts: imx6sl: remove the use of pingrp macros
Shawn Guo
shawn.guo at linaro.org
Tue Jan 28 06:20:49 EST 2014
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:17:22AM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> [... and so on for the other groups ... ]
>
> I'm confused now :-) . Current linux-next [0] shows the pin-settings as part
> of imx6sl.dtsi - a way a lot of other architectures organize their pingroups
> too, with the board file only referencing the relevant pingroups from the
> predefined ones of the soc.
>
> So I guess your move to the pingrp-header moved them out of the imx6sl.dtsi to
> the .h and is not part of linux-next;
Yes, my for-next branch was excluded from linux-next temporarily for
some reason. I will ask Stephen to add it back once v3.14-rc1 is out.
That said, you can see nothing we developed in this cycle on linux-next
for now.
> but this patch (and the others in this
> series) now moves the definitions into the individual board files. Can't you
> just move them back to the soc-dtsi files to prevent each board duplicating
> them?
No. That will bring back the problem we try to solve from the
beginning [1].
Shawn
[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/275912/
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list